Skip to main content

iRubric: Diaspora Missiology Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Diaspora Missiology Presentation Luke-Acts Theme Presentation Each learning team picks a diaspora community in the United States and researches it in terms of its culture, history, current setting, and mission options/activity. The team will present the findings to the class. The presentation may take on a variety of forms but must come with a prepared electronic student study sheet. Rubric Code: UXA5A58 By RenateHood Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Humanities Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Diaspora Missiology Presentation
	Exceeds 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts
Quality of project 25 %	Exceeds Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. Project fully explored the diaspora community in its context; it showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.	Good Project was organized. Information presented was clear and interesting. Project explored the diaspora community in its context; it showed critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.	Fair Project was fairly organized. Information presented fairly clear. Project fairly explored the diaspora community in its context; it showed a fair degree of critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.	Poor Project was poorly organized; and/or information was presented was unclear at times; and/or project poorly explored the diaspora community in its context; and/or it showed poor thinking and little application of knowledge gathered.	Unacceptable Project was not organized; and/or information presented was unclear; and/or project did not explore the diaspora community in its context; and/or it showed no critical thinking or application of knowledge gathered.
Classroom Presentation 25 %	Exceeds Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the professor.	Good Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.	Fair Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were mostly unable to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.	Poor Presentation was somehwat audible, but needs lots of improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project need improvement. Group members were not able to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.	Unacceptable Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the professor.
Preparedness 20 %	Exceeds Students showed that they were completely prepared and demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject area.	Good Students showed that they were prepared sufficiently and demonstrated sufficient knowledge of the subject area.	Fair Students seemed to be prepared but one person seemed to carry the success of the presentation.	Poor Students seemed to be somewhat prepared but should have communicated more as a team.	Unacceptable Students did not seem prepared to present.
Applied Diaspora Missiology 15 %	Exceeds The group clearly understood and applied diaspora missiology and its multiple aspects.	Good The group basically understood and applied diaspora missiology.	Fair The group somewhat understood diaspora missiology and applied it in a limited way.	Poor The group exhibited a poor understanding of diaspora missiology and/or poorly applied it.	Unacceptable The group both misunderstood and failed to apply diaspora missiology.
Electronic Student Study Sheet 15 %	Exceeds The group prepared a clear, interactive, and informative electronic student study sheet.	Good The group prepared a clear and informative electronic student study sheet.	Fair The group prepared an electronic student study sheet but it lacked in content and organization.	Poor The group prepared an electronic student study sheet but it was of poor quality.	Unacceptable The group did not have an electronic student study sheet.

Keywords:

Missiology presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202