Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: The Kite Runner Character/Relationship Analysis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
The Kite Runner Character/Relationship Analysis
The Kite Runner Character/Relationship Analysis
Rubric Code:
UX7988A
By
yheadley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Reading
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Character Analysis
4 (80%+)
(N/A)
3 (70-79%)
(N/A)
2 (60-69%)
(N/A)
1 (50-59%)
(N/A)
F
(N/A)
Interpretation
4 (80%+)
Interpretation of the character's or relationship's traits are accurate and is based on logical and insightful reasons and textual references
3 (70-79%)
Interpretation of the characer's or relationship's traits are accurate and based on logical reasons and textual references
2 (60-69%)
Interpretation of the character's or relationship's traits are mostly accurate. Textual references or reasons may be based on insufficient textual references
1 (50-59%)
Interpretation of the character's or relationship's traits are inaccurate and based on random reasons or textual references
F
Does not meet criteria
Supporting Evidence
4 (80%+)
The evidence strongly and insightfully supports the interpretation. Evidence is clearly stated and more than two citations to the text.
3 (70-79%)
The evidence accurately supports the interpretation. Two citations are included, but not always clearly connected to the interpretation
2 (60-69%)
The evidence somewhat supports the interpretation. Two citations are sometimes included to support the interpretation and connection to the interpertation is not always clear.
1 (50-59%)
The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation. Less than two citations are random or not included to support the interpretation
F
Does not meet criteria
Introduction
4 (80%+)
Introduction grabs the readers attention and includes a strong and concise thesis
3 (70-79%)
Introduction tells about character/relationship but does not flow together smoothly.
2 (60-69%)
Introduction lacks overview and creativity.
1 (50-59%)
Introduction very basic with no supporting information or evidence.
F
Does not meet criteria
Mechanics/APA format
4 (80%+)
Fewer than three mechanical errors. All APA format criteria met.
3 (70-79%)
Fewer than five mechanical errors. All APA format criteria met.
2 (60-69%)
Mechanical errors interfere with effectiveness of paper.
APA format criteria used.
1 (50-59%)
Mechanical errors interfere with readability of paper. Little or no APA format criteria used.
F
Does not meet criteria
Conclusion
4 (80%+)
Includes a clear rewording / rephrasing of thesis. Reviews main points discussed in the body paragraphs. Adequately answers the "So what?"
3 (70-79%)
Includes a rewording/ rephrasing of thesis. Reviews main points discussed in the body paragraphs. Attempts to answer the "So what?"
2 (60-69%)
Restates thesis and main points without rewording.
Attempts to answer the "So what?"
1 (50-59%)
Either thesis or main points are missing. Th response to the "so what?" is very unclear.
F
Does not meet criteria
Subjects:
English
Types:
Reading
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Reading rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.