- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Physics Lab Report rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Physics Lab Report Physics Lab Report Rubric Code: UX34A5C By ajwitmerbosley Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Physics Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Physics Lab Rubric
	Proficient 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Needs Improvement 2 pts	Unsatisfactory 1 pts
Problem/Hypothesis	Proficient Hypothesis extends beyond class concepts. Hypothesis is clear & concise. If/then statement is directly related to the problem. Dependent/Independent variable are clearly recognized and identified.	Good Hypothesis is clear and concise, but does not extend beyond class concepts. If/then statement is directly related. Independent/dependent variables identified.	Needs Improvement Hypothesis is unclear. Independent/Dependent variables not identified.	Unsatisfactory Hypothesis is unrelated or insufficient. Variables not identified.
Title & Format	Proficient Includes a title that is relevant to experiment, lab is written with college-level vocabulary. Format is exactly as assigned. Zero spelling/grammatical errors	Good Title is descriptive. Report is written in correct format and typed, 1-3 spelling/grammatical errors	Needs Improvement Includes a title but title non-descriptive/one or more of the sections is out of order, 4-8 spelling/ grammatical errors	Unsatisfactory Title is not included/more than 3 of the sections are out of place/10 or more spelling/grammatical errors.
Procedures	Proficient Uses materials appropriately. Experiment is outstanding and represents college-level material. Steps are clear, concise, and sequential.	Good Steps are clear, concise, and sequential. 1-2 minor errors.	Needs Improvement Improper format and/or 3-5 errors.	Unsatisfactory 5 or more errors/not included.
Data (if applicable)	Proficient Presented in a chart, table, or graph as appropriate. All components include appropriate titles, are accurate, complete, and axes are properly titled/labeled.	Good Presented in a chart, table, or graph as appropriate. One label/title is missing. 1-2 pieces of data missing.	Needs Improvement Data presented but formatted incorrectly. Major errors or omissions. 2-3 labels/titles missing	Unsatisfactory Over half of data is missing/all labels/titles are missing or incorrectly presented.
Analysis/Conclusions	Proficient Conclusion includes thorough discussion. Hypothesis is restated. Analysis of whether hypothesis is supported or rejected.	Good Conclusion partially mentions hypothesis. Analysis mentions support or rejection of hypothesis with some but not all data being used as support/rejection.	Needs Improvement Brief conclusion not based upon the hypothesis/ at least 1 major error in spelling/grammar or relevance of data.	Unsatisfactory Hypothesis not mentioned, data not linked to support or rejection of hypothesis.