- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Y8 MYD Mini Project Explanation Text rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Y8 MYD Mini Project Explanation Text Rubric Code: UX2CCCW By masonj11 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 6-8

Mini Project Competency how the Y8 Mini project was organised
	Needs Developing 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Process Journal Definition, Location and Selection of research sources on the Google Site	Needs Developing The student has not documented their research in the journal. There are missing details and little evidence that research has been documented.	Average There are some missing or incomplete parts of the journal. Some evidence of independent research is evident	Good With some assistance and guidance the student selects organises and compiles the research process in the site.	Excellent The student independently selects organises and compiles the research process in the site.
Presentation Outcome Includes an Introduction, Explanation, Demonstration and Conclusion components	Needs Developing The student has not demonstrated the research in a full presentation. The presentation may miss out two to three of the components.	Average The student demonstrates what they have learnt in the from their research in the final presentation. The research may miss out one of the four components	Good With some guidance, the student demonstrates what they have learnt from their research in their final method of presentation. On e of the four components may not be as well covered as the others.	Excellent The student independently demonstrates what they have learnt from their research in their final method of presentation. The four components have been covered comprehensively
Genre Message Enter description	Needs Developing The presentation does not present the research information. Other genres such as narration or description are wrongly used in this context.	Average The presenter explains the process using some supporting evidence and awareness of stages of the explanation. More could be done to engage and stimulate the audience	Good The presenter explains a process in stages, clearly with supporting evidence. The research is objective and demonstrates some sense of audience. It attempts to make the explanation interesting for the viewer.	Excellent The message engages and persuades the reader. The presentation is objective and demonstrates a clear sense of audience so that the reader could be expected to be engaged and ultimately understand all stages of the research