iRubric: ATLA Article Critique rubric

The peer-reviewed ATLA article pertains directly either to the letter of Philemon or the letter to the Philippians. The article summary is of superb quality. The summary includes the main point of the author and flow of the article. The student submitted the article on time and uploaded it for the other students.

The ATLA article pertained either to the letter of Philemon or the letter to the Philippians and the article summary was in good shape or missed the article's main point and the main flow.

The ATLA article pertained fairly either to the letter of Philemon or the letter to the Philippians and/or the article summary was in fair shape.

The ATLA article pertained poorly either to the letter of Philemon or the letter to the Philippians and/or the article summary was in poor shape or missed the article's main point and/or mail flow and/or the assignment was turned in late.

The ATLA article was not peer reviewed and/or did not pertain directly either to the letter of Philemon or the letter to the Philippians and/or the article summary was missing and/or the assignment was turned in unacceptably late.

Nearly always, accurately analyzes the content; recognizes poor reasoning in the article; appropriately and fairly critiques the article; asks fair and appropriate questions.

Usually, accurately analyzes the content; recognizes poor reasoning in the article; appropriately and fairly critiques the article; asks fair and appropriate questions.

Often recognizes poor reasoning in the article; appropriately and fairly critiques the article; asks fair and appropriate questions. But several instances of poor analysis or inappropriate/unfair critique.

Sometimes recognizes poor reasoning in the article; appropriately and fairly critiques the article; asks fair and appropriate questions. But too many instances of poor analysis or inappropriate/unfair critique.

Analysis and critique are insufficient throughout.