- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Response to Literature- Character Attribute rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Response to Literature- Character Attribute Response to Literature- Character Attribute Essay Rubric Code: UB3X44 By Bmiciotta Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: K-5

Elements
	4 Exceeds Standard (N/A)	3 Meets Standard (N/A)	2 Approaching Standard (N/A)	1 Well Below Standard (N/A)
Summarizing 60 %	N/A Summary includes the main idea or topic sentence with supporting details. Retelling of story has the details in sequence.	N/A Student does not include the main idea but wrote many details. Retelling of story has the details in sequence.	N/A The summary includes the main idea but does include supporting details. Student does not retell the story.	N/A Response does not include the main idea with supporting details. Student was not clear about the story.
Theme: Loyalty 30 %	N/A Student defined Loyalty. Student gives 3 or more examples of both characters showed loyalty in the story.	N/A Student defined Loyalty. Student gives at 2-3 examples of the how both characters showed loyalty in the story.	N/A Student did not define Loyalty. Student gives some examples of both characters showed loyalty in the story.	N/A Student did not define Loyalty. Student gives few examples of both characters showed loyalty in the story. Examples are unclear.
Organization & Conventions 10 %	N/A Student has written the response with the retell in sequence. The paragraphs include a topic and closing sentences. Student used correct capitalization and punctuation.	N/A The student has an organized response, but the paragraphs did not include both a topic sentence closing. There are a few errors editing capitalization and punctuation errors.	N/A The details in the response are out sequence and some are missing. The paragraphs may not include a topic sentence and/or closing. There are many editing capitalization and punctuation errors.	N/A Student's response is not organized. Details are not sequence. Student did not edit the response for capitalization or punctuation errors.