Skip to main content

iRubric: The House on Mango Street Vignettes rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
The House on Mango Street Vignettes 
Rubric Code: UABW5X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Vignette Rubric
  Exemplary

10 pts

Proficient

7 pts

Developing

5 pts

Needs Improvement

3 pts

Writing Style

Exemplary

Vignettes mirror the style of Sandra Cisneros. There is much figurative languages, short sentences, and repetition of words.
Proficient

Some vignettes mirror the style of Sandra Cisneros. There is evidence of figuartive languages, short sentences, and repetition of words.
Developing

Few vignettes mirror the style of Sandra Cisneros. There is some evidence of figuartive languages, short sentences, and repetition of words.
Needs Improvement

Little/ to no vignettes mirror the style of Sandra Cisneros. There is little to no evidence of figuartive languages, short sentences, and repetition of words.
Organization

Exemplary

Eight vignettes are written, are at least the same length as the vignette from the book.
• Paragraphs are organized in a logical, fluid way.
• A clear focus is established and maintained in each vignette that strongly contributes to the story each vignette tells.
Proficient

Seven vignettes are written, are at least close in length to the original vignette, and properly formatted with minimal deviation.
• Paragraphs are organized clearly.
• The focus of each vignette is clear and contains little interruption or distraction.
Developing

Six vignettes are written, but one may be shorter than the original vignette length. Formatting is generally correct.
• Paragraphs demonstrate general organization.
• The focus of each vignette is somewhat clear and may contain some interruption, digressions, or distractions may confuse the reader.
Needs Improvement

Fewer than six vignettes are written, and may be shorter than original vignette length in the book.
• Paragraphs demonstrate confused organization.
• The focus of each vignette is unclear and contains interruption, digressions, and/or distractions that confuse the reader.
Figurative Language

Exemplary

Figurative language is expertly used with a variety of figurative language used that mirrors the types used in the model vignette. No examples are cliches. Student demonstrates a thorough understanding of the types of figurative language used in the original model vignette.
Proficient

Figurative language is used but writer uses more of one type of figurative language with some variation in type. Some of the examples may be cliches. Student demonstrates an understanding of the types of figurative language used in the original model vignette.
Developing

Some figurative language is used but writer relies heavily on one type of figurative language with little variation in type. Some of the examples may be cliches or taken right from the text. Student demonstrates some understanding of the types of figurative language used in the original model vignette.
Needs Improvement

Little to no figurative language is used and/or it is only one type (all simile, all metaphor, all personification etc...) with no variation. Examples may be incorrect and/or cliches. Student demonstrates no understanding of the figurative language used in the original vignette.
Production Value

Exemplary

The final project is well crafted, thoughtfully designed and exemplifies the student's effort. The vignettes are paired with pictures, photos and/or decorations.
Proficient

The final project is well crafted, well designed and shows a great deal of effort on the student's part. It may not have photos or pictures for every vignette.
Developing

The final project seems hastily put together and has a few design flaws. It does not look as though the student put 3 weeks worth of effort into this assignment.
Needs Improvement

The final project is poorly put together and/or has major design flaws. There isn't a single decorative element present in the project.
Accuracy

Exemplary

The vignettes follow the table of contents exactly.
Proficient

A vignette is out of order, but otherwise the project is constructed accurately.
Developing

2 or more vignettes are out of order.
Needs Improvement

Vignettes are in no logical order.
Grammar

Exemplary

There are no grammatical or mechanical errors.
Proficient

There are 1 - 2 grammatical or mechanical errors.
Developing

There are 3 - 4 grammatical or mechanical errors.
Needs Improvement

There are 5+ grammatical or mechanical errors.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202