Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Educ 638 Chapter Report rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Educ 638 Chapter Report
Educ 635 Chapter Presentation Rubric
Students will do a webinar based on an assigned textbook chapter.
Rubric Code:
UABBC3
By
edtechprof
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Chapter Presentation
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Coverage (x2)
Excellent
Chapter section is covered thoroughly and completely;all points are made with relevance for the chapter. Outside supporting material may have been added for more impact.
Good
Sufficient information that relates to the chapter and many good points are made but there's an uneven balance and little variation of material.
Fair
There is a great deal of important information that has been left out. <BR>
Coverage is not at graduate level.
Poor
Chapter is presented in an unclear fashion. Information does not support the chapters assignment.
Presentation Organization
Excellent
Chapter section is introduced in proper context and engages the audience.
Good
Presenters introduced the topic and have provided a context for presentation and made an attempt to engage the audience.
Fair
Presenters attempted to introduce the topic, attempt to provide some context as well as engaging the audience, however, these attempts may not have been effective.
Poor
Students failed to introduce the topic properly and no attempts were made to engage the audience.
Mastery of Content
Excellent
Presenters showed comprehensive grasp of the subject matter demonstrated by understanding of relevant concepts theories and issues.
Good
A thorough grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated.
Fair
A basic grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated.
Poor
A lack of familiarity with the subject matter is demonstrated through omission of material or miss interpretation of such concepts and theories.
Implications for Teachers
Excellent
Presenters shared at least 3 great insights or implications for teachers. Recommendations were appropriate and supportive of the content presented.
Good
Presenters shared at least 2 good insights or implications for teachers. Recommendations were appropriate and supportive of the content presented.
Fair
Presenters shared at least one insight or implication for teachers. Recommendations were appropriate and supportive of the content presented.
Poor
No recommendations were given or recommendations given were not supportive or directly connected to the content presented.
Interactivity
Excellent
Presenters presented information in an interactive way such as quick surveys, show of hands, an intriguing question, etc.
Good
Presenters utilized some interactive instruction.
Fair
Presenters talked to students and did not interact with students.
Poor
Presenters delivery was weak.
Visual Aids
Excellent
Visual aids enhanced presentation, and kept audience interest.
Good
Presentation of facts with some interesting "twists"; and held the audience attention most of the time.
Fair
Some related facts were presented, but students run off topic and lost their audience. Presented facts with little or no imagination or creativity.
Poor
Visual aids were of poor quality and/or distracted the audience and were hard to read and understand.<BR>
Or, no visual needs were used.
Hands-On Activity
Excellent
Presenters involved learners during the presentation through a hands-on activity that illustrates a concept being presented.
Good
The activity included most students and is connected with the content. It was helpful in understanding the material.
Fair
The activity was somewhat connected with the content. It was somewhat helpful in understanding the material.
Poor
The activity was not connected to the content and was not helpful in understanding the material.
Timing
Excellent
The presentation was within the allotted time. (20 minutes) It was neither rushed nor did it drag.
Good
The presentation went beyond the allotted time, or was too short. (+ or - 5 minutes)
Fair
The presentation went beyond the allotted time, or was too short. (+ or - 10 minutes)
Poor
The presentation went beyond the allotted time, or was too short. (+ or - 15 minutes)
Voice and Audio Quality
Excellent
Well modulated voice that was heard clearly through Blackboard Collaborate. The presenters made sure that audio was working well on their side and that no background noises will interfere during the presentation.
Good
Voice and audio became too loud or soft at times, otherwise the presentation was of acceptable audio quality.
Fair
Background noises and other distracting noises interfered with the presentation. Presentation may be difficult to listen to at times.
Poor
Other plans had to be made (e.g. rescheduling) because presenters were not able to make sure their audio was working.)
Keywords:
Chapter Presentations on Distance Education
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Education
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.