Skip to main content
iRubric: URTA graduate school rubric

iRubric: URTA graduate school rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
URTA graduate school 
Rubric Code: U6B6B9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric URTA AUDITION MONOLOGUE CHECK LIST
Enter rubric description
  Unsatifactory

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Maturity and Emotional Range

Enter description

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

The audition role selected greatly challenges the student's range and is from material with which the student DOES NOT feel familiar or feel comfortable.
Fair

The audition role selected challenges student's range and is from material with which the student feels familiar and feel comfortable.
Good

The audition role selected meets student's maturity and emotional range and is from material with which the student feels familiar and feel comfortable.
Context

Enter description

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student has limited knowledge of the play and does not understand the character in the context of the play.
Fair

Student has skimmed the entire play and understands the character in the context of the play.
Good

Student has read the entire play and understands the character in the context of the play.
Sources

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student has perused and selected material from monologue
Fair

N/A
Good

Student shy's away from discovering material in monologue collections
Comfortable, middle range

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student capabilities are greatly challenged.
Fair

Material selected is challenging; character does not fit
comfortably within the student's middle range. Risk-taking is geared to interpretation and presentation rather than casting.
Good

Student selects pieces that maximizes their assets and minimizes their weaknesses. Character fits
comfortably within student's middle range. Risk-taking is geared to interpretation and presentation rather than casting.
Singing/ Optional

Unsatifactory

N/A
Poor

N/A
Fair

N/A
Good

Presents a 30 second music selection (in addition to 3 minute selection)

Selection displays your range well

Note: Only sing if you are a trained singer. None of URTA's MFA programs recruit for Musical
Theatre specifically. A bad song after a good acting audition can leave doubt in the auditors'
minds.
Range and contrast
  Unsatifactory

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Selection of Pieces and contrast

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Fails to apply contrasting elements in auditioning such as:
dramatic/comedic; prosaic/poetic; urban/rural; etc., rather than age.
Fair

N/A
Good

Considers contrasting elements in auditioning such as:
dramatic/comedic; prosaic/poetic; urban/rural; etc., rather than age.

* Considers content from Greek plays as well as Shakespeare’s contemporaries and those of the Restoration
Mood, etc.

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Selections fails to contrast in mood, intention, rhythm, emotional level, content, etc.
Fair

Selections contrasts in at least two of the following below: mood, intention, rhythm, emotional level, content, etc.
Good

Selections contrasts in mood, intention, rhythm, emotional level, content, etc. (variety/ consistent)
Climatic material

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student embraces climactic material that requires great depth or intensity of emotion.
Fair

N/A
Good

Student avoids climactic material that requires great depth or intensity of emotion as there is not
enough time to achieve the emotional peaks effectively and honestly.
Passive Pieces

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student fails to steer clear of
dull and passive pieces which dwell on character or plot exposition.
Fair

N/A
Good

Student effectively steers clear of
dull and passive pieces which dwell on character or plot exposition.
Dramatic Conflict

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student selects pieces with involve narrative storytelling
and memory pieces; The select is inactive and fails to overcome obstacles.
Fair

Selects material does not contain consistent opportunity in which the character is
actively involved in overcoming obstacles in order to fulfill an immediate objective or intention. Selected pieces contain active intentions, yet inconsistently. i.e. What does your character want? What
is he/she doing to fulfill that “want?”
Good

Selects material in which the character is
actively involved in overcoming obstacles in order to fulfill an immediate objective or intention. Selected pieces contain active intentions. i.e. What does your character want? What
is he/she doing to fulfill that “want?”

*Narrative storytelling
and memory pieces tend towards inactivity.
Beginning/Middle/End
  Unsatifactory

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Beginning/middle/end

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Both selections require explanations and does not have a clear beginning, middle and end.
Fair

One selection is self-explanatory with a clear beginning, middle and end.
Good

Both selections are self-explanatory with a clear beginning, middle and end.
Transitions

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Transitions are jarring and/or illogical. The Who, What, Why, When or Where of the piece, is not clear through editing or staging.
Fair

The Who, What, Why, When or Where of the piece, is clear through editing or staging Transitions are logical, yet abrupt and jarring.
Good

Transitions are smooth
and logical. The Who, What, Why, When or Where of the piece, is clear through editing or staging.
Over-done

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student considers material without consciously considering trends and popular/ well-known selections
Fair

N/A
Good

Student considers material and works to uncover the trend and avoid over-done selections.
One Person Shows

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student avoids using one-person show material

* Student avoids using original material.
Fair

N/A
Good

Student avoids using one-person show material

* Student avoids using original material.
Overall impression
  Unsatifactory

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Attention-getters

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student embraces attention - getters/ sexually explicit or extremely offensive material
Fair

Student subtly inserts attention - getters/ sexually explicit or extremely offensive material
Good

Student avoids attention - getters/ sexually explicit or extremely offensive material as the material is a reflection of taste.

“you are what you present.”
Positive Impression

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student fails to showcase their students talents in the material selected; character loses; character is the victim; there is no "reversal of fortune."
Fair

Student presents strong writing, material, selection contrast, transitions, a beginning, middle, and end etc.; yet the character does not win
Good

Student leaves a positive impression; entire audition package works to showcase the students talents.
Strong Writing

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Poor writing
Fair

Writing is mediocre
Good

Student embraces strong writing.

* Good writing will always serve you better than mediocre
writing. You know the expression, “you are what you eat?” Here,
Monologue previously used

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student ignores the audition requirement and attempts to presents the material as it was in production.
Fair

N/A
Good

If using a performance piece in production, (a practice
considered unwise by most auditors), student completely reworks the monologue to suit the audition situation.
Relationship
  Unsatifactory

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Engaging communication

Unsatifactory

Fails to submit and/or does not meet criterion.
Poor

Student selects selections which require implied responses from the other character(s).
Fair

N/A
Good

Student avoids selections that require implied responses from the other character(s).

Student creates an active relationship with the character they are engaging
in their scene (as monologues directed to another character are more effective than internal or inner-directed soliloquies).





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60