iRubric: Team Presentation Evaluation Form rubric

Consistently clear, concise, well organized. Points were easy to follow because of the organization. Transitions between sections & speakers smooth and coordinated.

Consistently clear,
concise, well organized. Points were easy to follow
because of the organization. Transitions between sections & speakers
smooth and oordinated.

Not always clear or
concise. Organization was adequate, but weak. Occasionally wandered and was sometimes difficult to follow. Transitions between sections & speakers weak.

Often unclear and
disorganized, rambled too much. The presentation was
confusing and difficult to follow. Transitions between sections & speakers awkward.

Simple, clear, easy to
interpret, easy to read. Well coordinated with content, well designed, used very
effectively. Excellent
example of how to prepare and use good visual aids

Usually clear, easy to
interpret, easy to read. Generally well coordinated with content, design was
okay, generally used
effectively. Demonstrated
some understanding of how to use visual aids.

Marginally acceptable,
too complex, crowded, difficult to read or interpret.
Adequate coordination with
content. Used only
adequately. Showed little
understanding of how to
prepare and use visual aids.

Poor quality visual aids (or none), hard to read, technically inaccurate, poorly
constructed. Poor
coordination with content. Used poorly. The presenter did not seem to know how to
prepare or use visual aids effectively.

Clear, concise, major
points emphasized, clear recommendations, strong conclusion or call for action.

Referred to main points, recommendations weak or missing, weak conclusion or
call for action.

Vague mention of major points, no recommendations,
weak conclusion, weak or no call for action.

No summary, no
recommendations, no
conclusions, no call for action.

"That's it."