Skip to main content
iRubric: Critical Review Rubric

iRubric: Critical Review Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Critical Review Rubric 
Critical Book Review
Rubric for Critical Review of Secondary Sources
Rubric Code: U5X827
By dvcraigmtsu
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Critical Review Rubic
  A

200 pts

B

180 pts

C

160 pts

D

140 pts

F

120 pts

Sections
50 %

50 points
A

- Demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts, themes and ideas regarding qualitative inquiry.
- Sections reflect accurate identification of specific components of the study.
- Summary is clear and concise.
B

- Demonstrates an understanding of most of the concepts, themes, and ideas regarding qualitative inquiry.
- Sections reflect identification of components of this specific study.
- Summary is clear, but is somewhat repetitive and disorganized.
C

- Demonstrates only a partial understanding of most of the concepts, themes, and ideas regarding qualitative inquiry.
- Sections unorganized and unclear.
- Summary is somewhat confusing and difficult to follow.
D

- Demonstrates verly little comprehension of the any of the concepts, themes, and ideas regarding qualitative inquiry.
- Several sections missing.
- Summary is confusing and incomplete, and suggests that the work was not read in its entirety.
F

- Little evidence of completion and/or concern about material or assignment
Analysis
75 %

75 points
A

- Demonstrates
sophistication of thought.
- Communicates clearly and follows a logical sequence.
- Understands and critically evaluates
the work in terms of theoretical perspective, contextualization, documentation, balance, significance and appropriateness of conclusions, and style.
- Uses appropriate sources to support analysis.
B

- Presents sound points and argument.
- Communicates clearly and follows a logical sequence, with some minor lapses.
- Understands the work, but does not critically evaluate all aspects of it.
C

- Well-stated, but vague arguments.
- Uses general terms and does not always follow a logical sequence.
- Shows basic comprehension
of the work, with lapses in
understanding.
- Describes but does not critically evaluate the work.
D

- Rudimentary, vague arguments
- Does not have a clear central idea or
does not respond appropriately to the
assignment.
- Shows a basic misunderstanding of the work.
F

- Absence of any clear arguments
Organization
50 %

50 points
A

- Well organized with coherent structure
- Sophisticated transitional sentences
often develop one idea from the
previous one or identify their logical
relations. It guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or
progression of ideas.
B

- May stray at times from analysis to description.
- Shows a logical progression of ideas
and uses fairly sophisticated
transitional devices; e.g., may move
from least to more important idea.
- Some logical links may be faulty,
but each paragraph clearly relates to
paper's central idea.
C

- No disconcernible structure, but central focus of paper still easily understood.
- Transitions are not in a logical sequence.
- While each
paragraph may relate to central idea,
logic is not always clear.
D

- Random organization,
lacking internal paragraph structure
and uses few or inappropriate
transitions.
- Paragraphs may lack topic sentences or main ideas, or
may be too general or too specific to
be effective.
- Paragraphs may not all relate to paper's subject.
F

- Unorganized with little attention to detail.
Formatting
25 %

25 points
A

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
- Citations used appropriately when necessary.
- Citations and references reflect APA guidelines.
B

Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
- Citations are used appropriately.
- Citations and references somewhat reflect APA formatting guidelines.
C

-Paper contains several grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Language consistently lacks clarity, sentence structure may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing.
- Not all citations that are necessary are provided.
- Citations and references contain numerous errors and do not comply with APA
D

- Paper contains many grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Reader unable to understand or see connections between thoughts.
- Many necessary citations are missing.
- There is no consistency in the formatting of the citations and references.
F

Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Impossible for the reader to follow thinking from sentence to sentence.
- Few, if any, necessary citations are provided.
- References are missing or incomplete





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202