Skip to main content
iRubric: NJ Video Project rubric

iRubric: NJ Video Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
NJ Video Project 
Students will create a 5-10 minute video on a particular topic related to NJ history.
Rubric Code: U58W99
By histeach21
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Video Project
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

5 pts

Good

10 pts

Excellent

15 pts

Knowledge of Subject

Poor

The film did a poor job in demonstrating accurate recall of facts about people and/or events. Several important aspects were not present and/or inaccurately portrayed in film.
Fair

The film did a fair job in demonstrating accurate recall of facts about people and/or events. Some important aspects were not present and/ or inaccurately portrayed in film.
Good

The film did a good job in demonstrating accurate recall of facts about people and/or events. Only a few minor facts left out or inaccurate.
Excellent

The film did an excellent job of demonstrating accurate recall of facts about people and/or events. No important aspects/facts were left out or innacurate
Understanding of Subject

Poor

The film demonstrated poor understanding of the topic. There was no attempt to analyze its importance to NJ history.
Fair

The film demonstrated fair understanding of the topic. There was an attempt to analyze its importance to NJ history, but the connection was not clear.
Good

The film demonstrated a good understanding of the topic. There was some evidence of an attempt to analyze the topic's importance to NJ history. A clear connection was made throughout.
Excellent

The film demonstrated an excellent understanding of the topic. There was strong and clear analysis of topic and its importance to NJ history.
Script

Poor

There was no formal script. The dialogue was not logical. No quotes or primary resources from your research were used in the script. Dialogue inappropriate or inaccurate.
Fair

There was a formal script, but the dialogue was not logical. No quotes or primary resources from your research were used in the script. Dialogue inappropriate or inaccurate in a few places.
Good

There was a formal script. The dialogue was logical. A few quotes or primary resources from your research were used in the script. Dialogue was appropriate and accurate.
Excellent

There was a formal script. The dialogue was logical. Several quotes or primary resources from your research were used in the script. Dialogue was appropriate or accurate throughout the film.
Narration/Acting/Dialogue

Poor

Narrator/Dialogue rushes through or drags behind screen images. Narration/Dialogue is dry without emotion or change in inflection.
Fair

Narrator/Dialogue rushes through or drags behind screen images in a several places. Narration/Dialogue is dry without emotion or change in inflection in several places.
Good

Narrator/Dialogue rushes through or drags behind screen images in one or two spots. Narration/Dialogue is dry without emotion or change in inflection in one or two spots.
Excellent

Narrator/Dialogue runs at a good pace throughout the film. Narration/Dialogue is appropriate to on-screen images and uses a variety of inflection and emotion. Quality acting or animated characters.
Shot Usage

Poor

Shots are unorganized and do not show planning, purpose and or story objective.
Fair

Shots are unorganized in several spots and do not show planning, purpose and or story objective.
Good

Shots indicate a basic purpose and the theme of the project is evident.
Excellent

Shots are well organized and show evidence of planning. The purpose and or story objectiveis clear.
Sound & Music Clarity

(No copywright music without permission)
Poor

Sound is not clear. Unplanned background noise. Hard to hear and understand voices. Inappropriate sound or music.
Fair

Some background noise, for the most part voices are clear and easy to understand. For the most part music is appropriate.
Good

No background noise. A few times voices are unclear or hard to understand. Music used appropriately.
Excellent

No background noise. Voices are clear and easy to understand throughout film. Music is appropriate and adds creativity to film.
Editing

Poor

Editing is not consistent and detracts from the flow of the production.
Fair

Editing is smooth for the majority of the film and only detracts from a small portionof the film.
Good

Editing is smooth with only one instance of rough edits. The editing enhances the film for the most part.
Excellent

Editing is smooth throughout and enhances the continuity and flow of film. No instances of rough editing.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178