- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Reader's Theatre Group Pres rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Reader's Theatre Group Pres Reader's Theatre Group Pres Groups incorporate creative components into a reader's theatre format of a selection that they previously read Rubric Code: U43X56 By miele004 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: (none)

Reader's Theatre Group Presentation
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 3 pts	Poor 1 pts
Group Work/Planning Time	Excellent Group members stayed on task the entire class time allotted for the project and used time wisely.	Good At least some group members need improvement on how to use time wisely when working together in a group. The group was basically on task, but was not fully focused.	Poor Group members did not use time wisely when working together as a group. The group did not stay on task and did not work on the project without constant prompting.
Delivery	Excellent A combination of appropriate and effective eye contact, clarity and projection of voice, tone and pace, and gestures significantly enhanced the speaker's reading/presentation.	Good Inconsistent use of eye contact, clarity and projection of voice, tone and pace, and/or gestures interrupted the flow of the reading/presentation.	Poor Lack of eye contact, clarity and projection of voice, tone and pace, and/or appropriate gestures make the reading/presentation difficult to follow.
Creativity/Style	Excellent The format of the reading/presentation demonstrated creativity as each member read/presented with unique expressions, emotions, and gestures.	Good The format of the reading/presentation somewhat demonstrated creativity, but not as uniquely.	Poor Little or no creativity was demonstrated in the format of the reading/presentation.
Overall Presentation	Excellent All group members were on task and read/presented their parts on cue. Pacing effectively held the attention of the audience. Overall reading/presentation was enthusiastic.	Good Most group members were on task and read/presented their parts on cue. Pacing held the attention of the audience fairly well. Overall reading/presentation was generally enthusiastic.	Poor Few group members were on task and prepared to read/present on cue. Pacing was ineffective. Overall presentation was dull.