Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: RSP 262 Accreditation Report rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
RSP 262 Accreditation Report
RSP 262 Leadership Plan
Rubric Code:
U37X2A
By
conniegross
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Agency Accreditation Report
Exceeds Expectations
3 pts
Meets Expectations
2 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
1 pts
Agency Profile
10 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The student describes the organization in a manner that demonstrates a clear understanding of the organizational structure and purpose
Meets Expectations
The student describes the organization in a manner that demonstrates only a limited understanding of the organizational structure and purpose
Does Not Meet Expectations
The student describes the organization in a manner that demonstrates an inaccurate or unclear understanding of the organizational structure and purpose
Accreditation Checklist
10 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Overall, the content reflects an excellent application of accreditation principles. The checklist includes the required content and uses relevant standards. The ranking criteria is effective.
Meets Expectations
Overall, the content reflects a basic application of accreditation principles, but needs more development. The checklist includes most the required content and frequently uses relevant standards. The ranking criteria is effective.
Does Not Meet Expectations
Overall, the content does not reflect an adequate application of accreditation principles. Important content is either missing or vague. The checklist will not adequately assist with the accreditation process
Summary
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Overall, the summary captures the most important concepts from the accreditation process. Highlights and recommendations are appropriate to the context, and demonstrate a good understanding of course concepts
Meets Expectations
Overall, the summary captures some of the most important concepts from the accreditation process, but needs more development. Highlights and recommendations are usually appropriate to the context, and demonstrate a basic understanding of course concepts. Occasional errors or omissions detract from the quality of the summary.
Does Not Meet Expectations
Overall, the summary does not captures the most important concepts from the accreditation process, and needs more development. Highlights and recommendations are rarely appropriate to the context, and do not demonstrate a basic understanding of course concepts. Frequent errors or omissions seriously detract from the quality of the summary.
Reflection on the Process
10 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Overall, the student's reflection demonstrates an excellent understanding and application of the course content. Recommendations are thoughtful, insightful and could assist the agency in improving services
Meets Expectations
Overall, the student's reflection demonstrates an basic understanding and application of the course content. Recommendations are sometimes thoughtful, insightful and would need to be developed further before they would be helpful to an agency wishing to improve services
Does Not Meet Expectations
Overall, the student's reflection demonstrates a very limited understanding and application of the course content. Recommendations are usually vague or unclear and would provide little assistance to an agency wishing to improve services
Challenges and Opportunities
10 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Overall, the student identifies a clear description of challenges and opportunities that reflect a solid understanding of course content
Meets Expectations
Overall, the student identifies a description of challenges and opportunities that reflect a basic understanding of course content, but often lacks depth and clarity
Does Not Meet Expectations
Overall, the student identifies an unclear or vague description of challenges and opportunities that reflect a limited understanding of course content
Writing Mechanics / Report format
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Overall, the student's report is well-organized. APA citations are used appropriately. Few errors are evident, and do not detract from the overall quality of the assignment.
Meets Expectations
Overall, the student's report needs more attention to report format and writing mechanics. . APA citations are only used occasionally and contain some errors. Some errors are evident, and detract from the overall quality of the assignment.
Does Not Meet Expectations
Overall, the student's report lacks attention to report format and writing mechanics. . APA citations are rarely used, and are most often incorrect. Frequent errors are evident, and seriously detract from the overall quality of the assignment.
Subjects:
Humanities
(General)
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.