- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Conversation Performance Test Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Conversation Performance Test Rubric ESL Role Play Performance Test Rubric Role play a conversation about planning a funny video using different contexts. Rubric Code: U2494A2 By Lulateach Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Exam Grade Levels: 9-12

Role-play
	Excellent 3 pts	Very Good 2 pts	Good 1 pts	Needs Improvement 0.5 pts
Clarity	Excellent Speech was clear and comprehensible at all times.	Very Good Speech was awkward at times but always understandable.	Good Speech was awkward and incomprehensible to understand some of the time.	Needs Improvement Speech was awkward and incomprehensible at all times.
Pronunciation	Excellent Student's pronunciation was like a native speaker.	Very Good Student's pronunciation was understandable with some error.	Good Student's pronunciation made understanding difficult.	Needs Improvement Student's pronunciation was incomprehensible.
Fluency	Excellent Students were able to perform the conversation clearly with no difficulty.	Very Good Students was able to perform the conversation with little difficulty.	Good Student showed great difficulty in performing theconversation, but was able to complete the task.	Needs Improvement Student was unable to speak during the role play.
Tone and Intonation	Excellent Student showed excellent use of tone and intonation. Both tone and intonation were appropriate for the context of the conversation.	Very Good Student showed good use of tone and intonation, however, the tone or intonation was inappropriate for the context at times.	Good Student showed little change in tone and intonation. Speech was slightly robotic, showing very little emotion or inflection.	Needs Improvement Student lacked tone and intonation completely. Speech was robotic and monotonous, showing no emotion or inflection at all.
Content	Excellent The conversation was cohesive and contained all the necessary elements, including target language.	Very Good The conversation was cohesive: good use of target language.	Good The conversation was slightly disjointed in content. Some use of target vocabulary	Needs Improvement The conversation was disjointed in content. No use of target vocabulary
Getting into character	Excellent Students used gestures, voice fluctuations, and facial expressions to enhance the meaning of the conversation. Students make other believe that they were really the character.	Very Good Students used some gestures, voice fluctuations, and facial expressions to enhance the meaning of the conversation.	Good Students tried few gestures, voice fluctuations, and facial expressions. Students did not make the audience felt the message of the conversation.	Needs Improvement Students did not use gestures, voice fluctuation, or facial expressions.