Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Visual Analysis Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Visual Analysis Rubric
Visual Analysis Rubric
Students are asked to study and analyze a work of art on exhibit at MCAD with reference to course material as appropriate.
Rubric Code:
U247BW7
By
dotreeser
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Reflection
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Visual Analysis Rubric
Absent
50 pts
Minimal
60 pts
Developing
75 pts
Competent
85 pts
Excellent
100 pts
Thesis
Absent
The paper lacks a thesis statement.
Minimal
Thesis is unclear or a non-issue.
Developing
Thesis is underdeveloped.
Competent
Thesis is clearly formulated, but lacks creativity and/or complexity.
Excellent
Thesis is creative and well developed.
Observations
Absent
Makes no specific or descriptive observations of the work.
Minimal
Makes few specific or descriptive observations of the work.
Developing
Makes some observations of the work, but they remain vague and generalizing; they do not tie to broader claims or ideas.
Competent
Observations of the work are often specific and descriptive, but they may not tie clearly to broader claims or ideas.
Excellent
Observations of the work are highly specific, descriptive, and clearly tied to broader claims that support the paper's main ideas.
Analysis
Absent
Does not analyze the work in light of visual observations.
Minimal
Analysis is limited; may resemble a "laundry list" of features unconnected with larger ideas or may get off-topic.
Developing
Analysis of the work is attempted but is not sufficiently supported by visual and critical observations.
Competent
Draws together visual and critical observations to support analysis, but may not do so consistently or persuasively.
Excellent
Draws together visual and critical observations to support a persuasive, clear analysis that ties in to theoretical statement relevant to the discussion.
Writing
Absent
Writing is inarticulate and entirely ineffective.
Minimal
Writing has serious technical flaws; it may lack specificity or logical structure; meaning remains unclear.
Developing
Writing has moderate grammatical or other flaws, is poorly edited, and/or uses vague language that leaves meaning unclear.
Competent
Writing is competent, mostly grammatically correct, and generally effective, but may lack rhetorical force.
Excellent
Writing is fluent, articulate, and specific; it advances the argument with persuasiveness and rhetorical verve. Contains no or extremely few grammatical errors.
Presentation and structure
Absent
Does not follow given instructions. No inclusion of image/artwork as subject of analysis and discussion. Does not cite references. Does not follow structure of presentation.
Minimal
Included image of the subject/artwork being analyzed and discussed. Does not cite any reference. Structure of presentation is incomplete.
Developing
Included image of the subject/artwork being analyzed and discussed but lacks sufficient amount of references to support claims and opinion. Lacks
Competent
Included image of the subject/artwork being discussed. Follows given structure of presentation. Draws discussion from the visual imagery supplemented by related amount of theories with cited references.
Excellent
Included image of the subject/artwork being analyzed. Contains clear outline of presentation following given structure. Draws discussion of each point according to subject matter supported by amount of related references.
Subjects:
Humanities
Types:
Writing
Reflection
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.