Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Naugatuck River Formative Assessment rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Naugatuck River Formative Assessment
Rubric Code:
U2468XA
By
aphelan1
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Geology
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Naugatuck River Assessment
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Model (scientific vocabulary)
Poor
Model shows no use of scientific vocabulary to detail the student's predictions about the effects of weathering, erosion, and deposition on the river system.
Fair
Model only uses scientific vocabulary to detail student's predictions of the effects of one of the following processes: weathering, erosion, and deposition.
Good
Model uses scientific vocabulary to detail student's predictions about the effects of two of the following processes: weathering, erosion, and deposition on the river system.
Excellent
Model shows thorough and extensive use of scientific vocabulary to detail student's predictions about the effects of weathering, erosion, and deposition on the river system.
Model (connection of processes)
Poor
Model does not a show a connection between the forces of weathering, erosion and deposition or show an understanding of time's role.
Fair
Model shows a connection between two of the following forces: weathering, erosion, and deposition. Does not show an understanding of time's role.
Good
Model shows a connection between the forces of weathering, erosion, and deposition but does not show an understanding of time's role.
Excellent
Model shows a complete connection between the forces of weathering, erosion, and deposition that shows an understanding of time's role.
Model (relevance to science)
Poor
Model contains no content that is relevant to science.
Fair
Model contains a minimal amount of content relevant to science.
Good
Model contains content that is mostly relevant to science.
Excellent
Model contains only what is relevant to science.
Justifiation (evidence)
Poor
Justification for the model's prediction shows no use of evidence at any step and label of the model.
Fair
Justification for the model's prediction shows some use of evidence from either the lessons or provided pictures, but not both.
Good
Justification for the model's prediction shows some use of evidence from the lessons and provided pictures.
Excellent
Justification for the model's prediction shows a full use of evidence from the lessons and provided pictures with every step and label of the model.
Justification (scientific vocabulary)
Poor
Justification shows no use of scientific vocabulary to detail the student's predictions about the effects of weathering, erosion, and deposition on the river system.
Fair
Justification only uses scientific vocabulary to detail student's predictions of the effects of one of the following processes: weathering, erosion, and deposition.
Good
Justification uses scientific vocabulary to detail student's predictions about the effects of two of the following processes: weathering, erosion, and deposition on the river system.
Excellent
Justification shows thorough and extensive use of scientific vocabulary to detail student's predictions about the effects of weathering, erosion, and deposition on the river system.
Justification (connection of processes)
Poor
Justification does not a show a connection between the forces of weathering, erosion and deposition or show an understanding of time's role.
Fair
Justification shows a connection between two of the following forces: weathering, erosion, and deposition. Does not show an understanding of time's role.
Good
Justification shows a connection between the forces of weathering, erosion, and deposition but does not show an understanding of time's role.
Excellent
Justification shows a complete connection between the forces of weathering, erosion, and deposition that shows an understanding of time's role.
Justification (relevance to science)
Poor
Justification contains no content that is relevant to science.
Fair
Justification contains a minimal amount of content relevant to science.
Good
Justification contains content that is mostly relevant to science.
Excellent
Justification contains only what is relevant to science.
Subjects:
Geology
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Geology rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.