Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Website / ePortfolio Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Website / ePortfolio Rubric
Website / ePortfolio Rubric
Rubric to evaluate a website or ePortfolio made by students.
Rubric Code:
U22CWB
By
CRiordan
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
ePortfolio
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
ePortfolio Rubric
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Design Elements
Background
Poor
Background detracts from the readability of the site.
Fair
Background is consistent across pages and does not detract from readability.
Good
Background is attractive, consistent across pages, adds to the theme or purpose of the site, and does not detract from readability.
Excellent
Background is exceptionally attractive, consistent across pages, adds to the theme or purpose of the site, and does not detract from readability.
Colors
Poor
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links make the content hard to read or otherwise distract the reader.
Fair
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links do not detract from the content.
Good
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links do not detract from the content, and are consistent across pages.
Excellent
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links form a pleasing palette, do not detract from the content, and are consistent across pages.
Fonts
Poor
A wide variety of fonts, styles and point sizes was used.
Fair
The fonts are consistent and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
Good
The fonts are consistent, easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
Excellent
The fonts are consistent, easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. Use of font styles (italic, bold, underline) is used consistently and improves readability.
Purpose & Theme
Poor
The site lacks a purpose and theme.
Fair
The purpose and theme of the site is somewhat muddy or vague.
Good
The site has a clearly stated purpose and theme, but may have one or two elements that do not seem to be related to it.
Excellent
The site has a well-stated clear purpose and theme that is carried out throughout the site.
Graphics
Poor
Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR distract the reader.
Fair
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, and are of good quality.
Good
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Excellent
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are thoughtfully cropped, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Sounds
Poor
Music, audio clips and/or sounds were seemingly used randomly OR typically detracted from the overall site.
Fair
Music, audio clips and/or sounds are thoughtfully edited and used, but 1 or 2 detracted from the overall site.
Good
Music, audio clips and/or sounds are used only where they add to reader understanding of the content or to make the site more accessible to persons with visual handicaps.
Excellent
Music, audio clips and/or sounds are thoughtfully edited and used only where they add to reader understanding of the content or to make the site more accessible to persons with visual handicaps.
Layout
Poor
The Web pages are cluttered looking or confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements.
Fair
The Web pages have a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements.
Good
The Web pages have an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements.
Excellent
The Web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.
Navigation
Poor
Some links do not take the reader to the sites described. A user typically feels lost.
Fair
Links for navigation take the reader where s/he expects to go, but some needed links seem to be missing. A user sometimes gets lost.
Good
Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages (forward and back), and internal links take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Excellent
Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages (forward and back), and take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user does not become lost.
Content
Link Quality
Poor
Less than 3/4 of the links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
Fair
Most links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
Good
Almost all links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
Excellent
All links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
Page Info
Poor
Several Web pages do not contain a statement of authorship, school name, and/or date of publication/date last edited.
Fair
Most (75-80%) Web pages contain a statement of authorship, school name, and date of publication/date last edited.
Good
Almost all Web pages contain a statement of authorship, school name, and date of publication/date last edited.
Excellent
Every Web page contains a statement of authorship, school name, and date of publication/date last edited.
Citations & References
Poor
Borrowed materials are not properly documented OR material was borrowed without permission from a site that requires permission
Fair
Fair use guidelines are followed with clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for most borrowed material. No material is included from Web sites that state that permission is required unless permission has been obtained.
Good
Fair use guidelines are followed with clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for almost all borrowed material. No material is included from Web sites that state that permission is required unless permission has been obtained.
Excellent
Fair use guidelines are followed with clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for all borrowed material. No material is included from Web sites that state that permission is required unless permission has been obtained.
Spelling and Grammar
Poor
There are more than 5 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Fair
There are 4-5 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Good
There are 1-3 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Excellent
There are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Content Accuracy
Poor
There are several inaccuracies in the content provided by the students OR many of the requirements were not met.
Fair
Almost all of the information provided by the student on the Web site is accurate and almost all of the requirements have been met.
Good
Almost all the information provided by the student on the Web site is accurate and all requirements of the assignment have been met.
Excellent
All information provided by the student on the Web site is accurate and all the requirements of the assignment have been met.
Accessibility
Poor
The needs of visually impaired Internet users are ignored.
Fair
Most images used for navigation have an ALT tag that describes the image and where it links to so people who are visually impaired can use the Web site well.
Good
All images used for navigation have an ALT tag that describes the image and where it links to so people who are visually impaired can use the Web site well.
Excellent
All images, especially those that are used for navigation, have an ALT tag that describes the image and its link so people who are visually impaired can use the Web site well.
Outcome
Interest
Poor
The author has provided only the minimum amount of information and has not transformed the information to make it more interesting to the audience (e.g., has only provided a list of links to the content of others).
Fair
The author has put lots of information in the Web site but there is little evidence that the person tried to present the information in an interesting way.
Good
The author has tried to make the content of this Web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
Excellent
The author has made an exceptional attempt to make the content of this Web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
Learning
Poor
Student did not appear to learn much from this project. Cannot answer most questions about the content and the procedures used to make the web site.
Fair
The student has a fair understanding of the material included in the site. Can easily answer most questions about the content and procedures used to make the web site.
Good
The student has a good understanding of the material included in the site. Can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the web site.
Excellent
The student has an exceptional understanding of the material included in the site and where to find additional information. Can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the web site.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
English
Types:
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More ePortfolio rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.