Skip to main content
iRubric: Evidence-Based Persuasive Presentation rubric

iRubric: Evidence-Based Persuasive Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evidence-Based Persuasive Presentation 
Rubric Code: TXX5B95
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Persuasive Presentation
  Outstanding

2 pts

Good

1.75 pts

Fair

1.5 pts

Needs Work

1 pts

Introduction (10 pts)
Attention Getter
1 pts

Outstanding

Outstanding, creative attention- getting opening sentences
Good

Adequately got attention but lacked enthusiasm
Fair

Communicated the topic but lacks any attention-getting features
Needs Work

Lack direction and attention-getting features
Thesis/Proposition
3 pts

Outstanding

Thesis clearly revealed & well structured for presentation as well as audience.
Good

Thesis stated & appropriate for the presentation as well as audience.
Fair

Thesis needs strength or structure. Audience is somewhat considered.
Needs Work

Thesis is missing OR
Preview
2 pts

Outstanding

Previews body of presentation in a memorable & effective way.
Good

Previews body so audience knows main points in brevity.
Fair

Preview incomplete
Needs Work

Preview is missing
Body (14 pts)
Organizational Flow
2 pts

Outstanding

Outstanding structure and logical flow
Good

Adequate flow of points
Fair

Difficult to follow structure
Needs Work

No apparent logic to flow of points
Major Points
4 pts

Outstanding

Main points are effective & strongly support thesis, support thesis, shows excellent citation or research/resources. Extremely persuasive
Good

Main points are separate & support thesis, shows good research foundation, very good citation of research/resources. Very good persuasive effort.
Fair

Some main points overlap or are redundant, shows signs of research. adequate citation of research/resources. Adequate persuasive effort.
Needs Work

Some main points are unclear, limited research shown, limited to minimal citation of research/resources. Attempts to persuade with limited success.
Transitions
1 pts

Outstanding

Excellent flow between parts of the speech
Good

Adequate movement throughout the speech
Fair

Somewhat difficult to follow points
Needs Work

Difficult to follow structure
Conclusion (12 pts)
Logical Closure
3 pts

Outstanding

Clearly used the thesis/proposition as a key feature of the conclusion
Good

Adequately brought audience back to thesis/proposition
Fair

Only limited hint of thesis/proposition
Needs Work

Failed to bring audience back to the thesis/proposition
Psychological Closure
2 pts

Outstanding

Concretely communicated how audience should react to the thesis/proposition
Good

Attempt to tell the audience how to react to the thesis/proposition
Fair

Only briefly hinted how the audience should react to the thesis/ proposition
Needs Work

Failed to communicate how audience should react to the speech
Closing Sentences
2 pts

Outstanding

Ended with an outstanding clincher.
Moral & WOW statements are compelling & memorable.
Good

Ended with an adequate closing.
Moral & WOW statement are clear and complete.
Fair

Weak closing—lacked any impact.
Moral & WOW statement are complete but lack a sense of closure.
Needs Work

Fizzled out.
Presentation ends abruptly, may be missing elements of Moral & WOW statement.
Content (14 pts)
Thorough
4 pts

Outstanding

Outstanding content using a variety of supporting materials
Good

Adequate material and generally varied supporting materials
Fair

Weak material which sometimes lacked relevancy with the points
Needs Work

Little or no adequate supporting materials and/or inaccurate supporting materials
Cited Sources
1 pts

Outstanding

Always cited sources clearly
Good

Generally cited sources clearly
Fair

Cited few sources in the speech
Needs Work

Failed to cite any sources
Used Credible Sources
2 pts

Outstanding

Many credible and varied sources
Good

Adequate supporting materials from a variety of credible sources
Fair

Few credible sources
Needs Work

No credible sources cited and/or no variety in source types
Extemporaneous Delivery
(18 pts)
Posture
1 pts

Outstanding

Stood straight with no fidgeting and acted confident
Good

Mostly stood straight at ease with little fidgeting
Fair

Slouched and lacked confidence and showed some fidgeting
Needs Work

Slouched over and/or leaned on the podium and moved around too much
Enthusiasm/Conviction
1 pts

Outstanding

Delivered with outstanding enthusiasm and conviction
Good

Generally showed enthusiasm and conviction
Fair

Showed limited enthusiasm and conviction
Needs Work

Showed no enthusiasm or conviction
Eye Contact
1 pts

Outstanding

Sustained eye contact with every audience member and only occasionally looked at notes
Good

Looked at audience members frequently but also at notes
Fair

Occasionally looked at audience but no one specifically and looked mostly at notes
Needs Work

Never looked at the audience, only at notes
Gestures
1 pts

Outstanding

Natural and effective gestures which supported the speech
Good

Fairly good gestures used at times throughout the speech
Fair

Few if any gestures used in a stiff and unnatural way
Needs Work

No gestures
Volume
1 pts

Outstanding

Loud enough to hear every word
Good

Occasional word or phrase not loud enough
Fair

Frequently spoke too softly to hear words and phrases
Needs Work

Difficulty hearing large chunks of the speech or important/key works
Conversational Tone
1 pts

Outstanding

Delivered with conversational quality
Good

Generally conversational tone
Fair

Delivered with limited conversational tone
Needs Work

Talked at audience rather than with audience
Rate
1 pts

Outstanding

Excellent rate of speech appropriate to the content
Good

Generally good rate of speech
Fair

Sometimes spoke either too fast or too slow
Needs Work

Spoke either much too fast or too slow
Vocal Variety
1 pts

Outstanding

Outstanding vocal variety in volume, rate, and pitch
Good

Adequate vocal variety in volume, rate, and pitch
Fair

Limited vocal variety in volume, rate, and pitch
Needs Work

Mostly monotone and mumbling
Attire
2 pts

Outstanding

Professional & smart attire creates air of credibility, believability, & polish.
Good

Attire is mostly professional & appropriate for speech topic
Fair

Your clothing choices minimally distract from the message. Wears clothes with images and logos.
Needs Work

Attire too casual. Your choices diminish your credibility by drawing attention to themselves & distracting from the message.
Overall Effect of the Speech
(12 pts)
Argument and Discussion
5 pts

Outstanding

Persuasive argument or thoughtful discussion expressed well with substantiation based on facts in articles & other sources.
Good

Persuasive argument of opinion or discussion issue expressed with factual substantiation based on facts in article and other sources.
Fair

Moderately persuasive argument of opinion expressed with some factual substantiation based on article and our course or other materials/sources, or discussion question posed but with little exploration.
Needs Work

No personal reaction to the subject matter given. Lack of persuasive argument of opinion expressed without factual substantiation or no discussion question posed.
Presentation Aids
1 pts

Outstanding

Presentation aids effective, easy to see, appropriately revealed & concealed.
Good

Presentation aids support presentation, easy to see.
Fair

Presentation aids distract from presentation or feel incomplete (as though a concept should have been illustrated with a presentation aid).
Needs Work

Presentation aids missing.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232