Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Ideal Toy rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Ideal Toy
The Challenge: Your challenge is to improve a toy that uses various chemical and/or gas principles. The new toy should be appealing to a certain age group of your choice. You will need to prepare a presentation for the board of the toy company. Your presentation should include: 1. A written proposal of the improvement that should be made to the toy and why. The proposal must include at least two chemical and/or gas concepts studied in this unit. 2. Either a detailed drawing of the new version of the toy or a mock prototype of the toy 3. Any potential hazards or waste-disposal issues incurred by your improvement
Rubric Code:
TXAXWW
By
nicolearkin
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Chemistry
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
Poor
5.5 pts
Fair
7 pts
Good
8.5 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Presentation
Enter criteria description
Poor
Presentation includes one out of the four necessary components.
1. Visual Aid
2. Diagram or prototype of improved toy
3. Explanation of how the improved toy will work better
4. Hazard and waste-disposal issues
Fair
Presentation includes two out of the four necessary components.
1. Visual Aid
2. Diagram or prototype of improved toy
3. Explanation of how the improved toy will work better
4. Hazard and waste-disposal issues
Good
Presentation includes three out of the four necessary components.
1. Visual Aid
2. Diagram or prototype of improved toy
3. Explanation of how the improved toy will work better
4. Hazard and waste-disposal issues
Excellent
Presentation includes all of the necessary components.
1. Visual Aid
2. Diagram or prototype of improved toy
3. Explanation of how the improved toy will work better
4. Hazard and waste-disposal issues
Quality of Presentation
Enter criteria description
Poor
Presentation is lacking more than three qualifications:
1. Organization
2. Audience appeal
3. Eye contact
4. Time limit
5. Clarity of explanation
Fair
The presentation is lacking three of the presentation qualifications:
1. Organization
2. Audience appeal
3. Eye contact
4. Time limit
5. Clarity of explanation
Good
The presentation is lacking one or two presentation qualifications:
1. Organization
2. Audience appeal
3. Eye contact
4. Time limit
5. Clarity of explanation
Excellent
The presentation contains all of the following qualifications:
1. Organization
2. Audience appeal
3. Eye contact
4. Time limit
5. Clarity of explanation
Chemical Principles
Enter criteria description
Poor
Anything including less than two chemical concepts falls immediately into this category.
Fair
The chemistry must embody all of the following:
1. Variety used: At least two different chemical concepts
2. Explanation of chemistry involved.
3. Explanation may have errors in accuracy but is mostly correct.
Good
The chemistry must embody all of the following:
1. Variety used: At least two different chemical concepts
2. Explanation of chemistry involved at least one of the following: visual aids, diagrams, chemical equations, reactions, or drawings
3. Accuracy of explanation
Excellent
The chemistry must embody all of the following:
1. Variety used: At least two different chemical concepts
2. Explanation of chemistry involved at least two of the following: visual aids, diagrams, chemical equations, reactions, or drawings
3. Accuracy of explanation
Written proposal
Poor
Includes less than two of the following:
1. Rationale
2. Visuals
3. Explanation of chemistry
Fair
Includes two out of three of the following:
1. Rationale
2. Visuals
3. Explanation of chemistry
Proposal is less than two pages double-spaced and does not site sources at the end of the paper.
Good
Includes two out of three of the following:
1. Rationale
2. Visuals
3. Explanation of chemistry
Proposal is less than two pages double-spaced and sites sources of research at the end.
Excellent
Includes:
1. Rationale
2. Visuals
3. Explanation of chemistry
Proposal is at least two pages double-spaced and sites sources of research at the end.
Grammar and vocabulary usage
Poor
Grammar inhibits meaning in paper. Vocabulary usage does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.
Fair
Grammar mistakes cloud meaning of the paper. Vocabulary words may be misused and the language is confusing.
Good
Grammar mistakes are frequent and show carelessness yet do not cloud the meaning of the paper. Vocabulary enhances the meaning of the paper.
Excellent
There are almost no grammar mistakes. Meaning is maintained even with a few errors present. Vocabulary use is appropriate and enhances the meaning of the paper.
Keywords:
Chemistry Project-Based
Subjects:
Chemistry
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Chemistry rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.