Skip to main content
iRubric: Ideal Toy rubric

iRubric: Ideal Toy rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Ideal Toy 
The Challenge: Your challenge is to improve a toy that uses various chemical and/or gas principles. The new toy should be appealing to a certain age group of your choice. You will need to prepare a presentation for the board of the toy company. Your presentation should include: 1. A written proposal of the improvement that should be made to the toy and why. The proposal must include at least two chemical and/or gas concepts studied in this unit. 2. Either a detailed drawing of the new version of the toy or a mock prototype of the toy 3. Any potential hazards or waste-disposal issues incurred by your improvement
Rubric Code: TXAXWW
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Chemistry  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Poor

5.5 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

8.5 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Presentation

Enter criteria description

Poor

Presentation includes one out of the four necessary components.
1. Visual Aid
2. Diagram or prototype of improved toy
3. Explanation of how the improved toy will work better
4. Hazard and waste-disposal issues
Fair

Presentation includes two out of the four necessary components.
1. Visual Aid
2. Diagram or prototype of improved toy
3. Explanation of how the improved toy will work better
4. Hazard and waste-disposal issues
Good

Presentation includes three out of the four necessary components.
1. Visual Aid
2. Diagram or prototype of improved toy
3. Explanation of how the improved toy will work better
4. Hazard and waste-disposal issues
Excellent

Presentation includes all of the necessary components.
1. Visual Aid
2. Diagram or prototype of improved toy
3. Explanation of how the improved toy will work better
4. Hazard and waste-disposal issues
Quality of Presentation

Enter criteria description

Poor

Presentation is lacking more than three qualifications:
1. Organization
2. Audience appeal
3. Eye contact
4. Time limit
5. Clarity of explanation
Fair

The presentation is lacking three of the presentation qualifications:
1. Organization
2. Audience appeal
3. Eye contact
4. Time limit
5. Clarity of explanation
Good

The presentation is lacking one or two presentation qualifications:
1. Organization
2. Audience appeal
3. Eye contact
4. Time limit
5. Clarity of explanation
Excellent

The presentation contains all of the following qualifications:
1. Organization
2. Audience appeal
3. Eye contact
4. Time limit
5. Clarity of explanation
Chemical Principles

Enter criteria description

Poor

Anything including less than two chemical concepts falls immediately into this category.
Fair

The chemistry must embody all of the following:
1. Variety used: At least two different chemical concepts
2. Explanation of chemistry involved.
3. Explanation may have errors in accuracy but is mostly correct.
Good

The chemistry must embody all of the following:
1. Variety used: At least two different chemical concepts
2. Explanation of chemistry involved at least one of the following: visual aids, diagrams, chemical equations, reactions, or drawings
3. Accuracy of explanation
Excellent

The chemistry must embody all of the following:
1. Variety used: At least two different chemical concepts
2. Explanation of chemistry involved at least two of the following: visual aids, diagrams, chemical equations, reactions, or drawings
3. Accuracy of explanation
Written proposal

Poor

Includes less than two of the following:
1. Rationale
2. Visuals
3. Explanation of chemistry
Fair

Includes two out of three of the following:
1. Rationale
2. Visuals
3. Explanation of chemistry

Proposal is less than two pages double-spaced and does not site sources at the end of the paper.
Good

Includes two out of three of the following:
1. Rationale
2. Visuals
3. Explanation of chemistry

Proposal is less than two pages double-spaced and sites sources of research at the end.
Excellent

Includes:
1. Rationale
2. Visuals
3. Explanation of chemistry

Proposal is at least two pages double-spaced and sites sources of research at the end.
Grammar and vocabulary usage

Poor

Grammar inhibits meaning in paper. Vocabulary usage does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.
Fair

Grammar mistakes cloud meaning of the paper. Vocabulary words may be misused and the language is confusing.
Good

Grammar mistakes are frequent and show carelessness yet do not cloud the meaning of the paper. Vocabulary enhances the meaning of the paper.
Excellent

There are almost no grammar mistakes. Meaning is maintained even with a few errors present. Vocabulary use is appropriate and enhances the meaning of the paper.



Keywords:
  • Chemistry Project-Based

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232