iRubric: Informational Texts Annotation/Close Reading rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Informational Texts Annotation/Close Reading Informational Texts Annotation/Close Reading Rubirc designed to score student annotations and evaluations of informational texts (RI.8.1, RI.8.6, and RI.8.8) Rubric Code: TX9W428 By jeraldhernandez Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Assignment Grade Levels: 6-8

Classwork Score
	Beginning 10 pts	Progressing 20 pts	Meets 30 pts	Exemplary 40 pts
Annotation	Beginning Student annotated on less than 40% or less) of the passage/article.	Progressing Student annotated some (50%-75%) of the passage/article.	Meets Student annotated almost the entire (75%-80%) passage/article. Students fallowed most coolers used in the annotation anchor chart successfully.	Exemplary Student's annotations show that s/he has engaged with the text on every page using several previously taught reading and comprehension skills. Students fallowed all coolers used in the annotation anchor chart successfully.
Evaluation/Cause and Effect	Beginning Student was not able to identify a cause and effect relation	Progressing Student was able to identify one cause and effect relation	Meets Student was able to identify two cause and effect relation and systematically correlate them.	Exemplary Student was able to identify at least two cause and effect relations and systematically correlate them and was able to describe them in their notebooks in complete sentences.
Analyze/Cognates	Beginning Student was not able to identify any cognates/academic vocabulary	Progressing Student was able to identify 2 cognates academic vocabulary	Meets Student was able to identify 5 cognates academic vocabulary	Exemplary Student was able to identify 6 or more cognates academic vocabulary
Application/Main Idea	Beginning Student was unable to identify the main idea of the passage/paragraph, along with support details.	Progressing Identifies one central idea and some supporting details.	Meets Identifies two central ideas and analyzes key supporting details.	Exemplary Identifies at least three central ideas and analyzes with supporting details, draws inferences and makes connections.