Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Community Gardener Portrait (Oral History Project) rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Community Gardener Portrait (Oral History Project)
Oral History Project
Students will be partnered with a gardener who will function as mentor. Students will interview and get to know this person in order to write a portrait of who they are and why they engage in community gardening. Stories and anecdotes people share about their hobbies and practices are extremely valuable to the understanding of larger food-based social movements of which we are a part.
Rubric Code:
TX8W9C2
By
ClaudiaH
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Oral History Project
Excellent
4 pts
Great
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Improvement Needed
1 pts
Does Not Meet Requirements
0 pts
Preparation/Interview Questions
Excellent
Interview Questions are typed and included in appendix page. There are at least 5 interview questions; all are open ended and are well worded and thought out.
Great
Interview Questions are typed and included in appendix page. There are at least 4 interview questions; most are open ended and are mostly well worded and thought out.
Good
Interview Questions are typed and are included in paper, but not necessarily in appendix page. There are at least 3 interview questions, they are mostly open ended show some thought.
Improvement Needed
Interview Questions are typed and are included in paper, but not necessarily in appendix page. There are at least 2 interview questions, only one question is open ended and shows some thought.
Does Not Meet Requirements
Interview Questions are not included in paper or in appendix page. There is only 1 interview questions or none (0), the question is not open ended and shows no thought.
Interview
Excellent
Student completed a face-to-face interview in a timely manner. Student also conducted follow up interview & consulted mentor to ensure accuracy of information collected.
Great
Student completed a face-to-face interview in a timely manner. Student did not conduct follow up interviews, but did consult mentor to ensure accuracy of information collected.
Good
Student completed an email interview in a timely manner. Student did not conduct follow up interviews, but did consult mentor to ensure accuracy of information collected.
Improvement Needed
Student completed a late email interview. Student did not conduct follow up interviews nor consult mentor to ensure accuracy of information collected.
Does Not Meet Requirements
Student did not completed an interview by the due date or ever.
Documentation of Interview
Excellent
If documentation of interview was allowed by gardener mentor, it was done using high quality photographs, video or audio recording devices. These images are included in the paper in a manner that supports the narrative.
Great
If documentation of interview was allowed by gardener mentor, it was done using good quality photographs, video or audio recording devices. These images are included in the paper in a manner that mostly supports the narrative.
Good
If documentation of interview was allowed by gardener mentor, it was done using okay to tolerable quality photographs, video or audio recording devices. These images are included in the paper in a manner that somewhat supports the narrative.
Improvement Needed
If documentation of interview was allowed by gardener mentor, it was done using poor quality photographs, video or audio recording devices. These images are not included in the paper in a manner that supports the narrative.
Does Not Meet Requirements
Student did not submit documentation of interview.
Check-in Requirements
Excellent
Student turned in complete draft by the due date and gave a well organized presentation of their work by the required date.
Great
Student turned in a mostly complete draft by the due date and gave a mostly well organized presentation of their work by the required date.
Good
Student completed interview in a timely manner; turned in a somewhat complete draft and presented a somewhat well organized presentation of their work by the required date.
Improvement Needed
Student did not complete interview in a timely manner; turned in an outline or jottings rather than a complete draft and they gave a disorganized presentation of their work on the required date.
Does Not Meet Requirements
Student did not complete interview in a timely manner or at all; turned in an outline or jottings rather than a complete draft and they did not give a presentation of their work on the required date.
Final Product
Excellent
Introduction is concise, effective, original and appropriate. Significant editing is demonstrated between text and Q/A, early draft. Text retains strong voice of interviewee. Text focuses on guiding question. Text details significance as well as concrete details.
Great
Introduction is concise, effective, original and appropriate. Significant editing is demonstrated between text and Q/A, early draft. Text retains strong voice of interviewee. Text focuses on guiding question. Text details significance as well as concrete details.
Good
Product represents learning; however, it lacks careful thought, creativity, time, and effort for maximum effectiveness.
Improvement Needed
Poorly created product that does not fully represent the possible learning opportunity.
Does Not Meet Requirements
Not applicable since product was not turned in.
Concluding thoughts
Excellent
Student concludes the narrative with a reflection of what they learned from their gardener mentor and/or how this gardener mentor's narrative reflects social, cultural or global concerns.
Great
Student concludes the narrative with a reflection of what they learned from their gardener mentor and/or how this gardener mentor's narrative reflects social, cultural or global concerns.
Good
Student concludes the narrative with a reflection of what they learned from their gardener mentor and attempts to make connections between the gardener mentor's narrative and social, cultural or global concerns.
Improvement Needed
Student concludes the narrative with a reflection of what they learned from their gardener mentor but does not make connections between the gardener mentor's narrative and social, cultural or global concerns.
Does Not Meet Requirements
Student does not conclude with a reflection of any kind.
Spelling & Grammar
Excellent
Writing is flawless; no typos, spelling, mechanical, grammar errors. Proper sentence structure is used. Paragraphs are 4-6 sentences long, no more no less. Paper has title.
Great
Writing is mostly flawless; few typos, spelling, mechanical, grammar errors. Proper sentence structure is used. Paragraphs are inconsistent in length. Paper lacks title.
Good
Writing contains flaws; several typos, spelling, mechanical, grammar errors. Proper sentence structure is somewhat consistent. Paragraphs are inconsistent in length. Paper lacks title.
Improvement Needed
Writing is riddled with flaws; many typos, spelling, mechanical, grammar errors. Proper sentence structure is not used. Paragraphs are too long. Paper lacks title.
Does Not Meet Requirements
Writing is poorly written and hard to read or incomplete. Proper sentence structure is not used. Paragraphs are too long. Paper lacks title.
Citation
Excellent
Text meets word guidelines. The works cited page is in MLA format. Garden mentor is included in citation.
Great
Text falls short of word guidelines. The works cited page is included but has some formatting mistakes. Garden mentor is included in citation.
Good
The works cited page is turned in but not in correct format. Garden mentor is included in citation, but cited incorrectly.
Improvement Needed
The information is cited but not on a separate page. Garden mentor is included in citation, but cited incorrectly.
Does Not Meet Requirements
Multiple problems with citation but does not fall under plagiarism. Garden mentor is not included in citation.
*If it is deemed that the student plagiarized, the school's discipline policy will be enforced.
Follow-Up
Excellent
Students will submit all artifacts and/or original material, along with a sincere Thank You card and note.
All or nothing on this one. Either 100% or a zero.
Great
Good
Improvement Needed
Does Not Meet Requirements
Students will submit all artifacts and/or original material, along with a sincere Thank You card and note.
All or nothing on this one. Either 100% or a zero.
Subjects:
English
History
Humanities
Types:
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.