Skip to main content

iRubric: Digital Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Digital Presentation 
Research, technology, oral presentation,Rubric
Rubric Code: TX5BX3B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric CATEGORY
  Below Standard/Not Evident

5 pts

Approaching Standard

7 pts

Meets Standard

9 pts

Above Standard

10 pts

Research

Below Standard/Not Evident

Limited information about chosen topic
Approaching Standard

Misinterpreted information, failed to identify relevant information.
Meets Standard

Recorded relevant information from multiple sources of information and evaluated information.
Above Standard

Accurately researched and used a variety of information sources, recorded and interpreted significant facts.
Textual Information

Below Standard/Not Evident

Incorporates one or no news pieces into presentation &/or summary is poor and difficult to understand the issue being discussed.
Approaching Standard

Incorporates two news pieces from different sources into presentation and/or summarization is too vague.
Meets Standard

Incorporates all three news pieces from different sources into presentation, but the summarization of the issue needs some help.
Above Standard

Incorporates all three news pieces from different sources into presentation and summarizes them well.
Organization

Below Standard/Not Evident

There is no logical progression of ideas.
Approaching Standard

Content is vague and is not presented in a logical progression. This makes it hard to follow the content and main idea.
Meets Standard

Content is mostly presented with a logical progression of supporting information.
Above Standard

There is a logical progression of ideas.
Relationships

Below Standard/Not Evident

Few or no connections made and/or relationships made are vague and need much more explaining to make sense.
Approaching Standard

Several connections are missing and/or your relationship between the issue & yourself/society is confusing.
Meets Standard

Does a good job explaining how this issue relates to yourself & society, but needs a little more.
Above Standard

Does an excellent job explaining how this issue relates to yourself & our society.
Judgments on Sources

Below Standard/Not Evident

The judgments and rationale are weak or are not given. It is extremely difficult and/or confusing to understand the differences/similarities in coverage of the issue
Approaching Standard

The judgments and rationale need help. There are many gaps in understanding the differences/similarities in coverage of the issue
Meets Standard

Makes good judgments & contributes a rationale, but there needs to be more explained about how the issue was covered.
Above Standard

Makes appropriate judgments & contributes meaningful rationale about news sources & how issues are covered.
Technology Presentation

Below Standard/Not Evident

Technology distracted from conveying appropriate content. <BR>
Use of font, color graphics, or effects, but these are distracting & interfere with the content presentation.
Approaching Standard

Technology did not assist in conveying thoughts well.<BR>
Fine use of font, color graphics, or effects, but these sometimes distract from the content.
Meets Standard

Good use of technology to convey thoughts, but it could be improved a little. Good use of font, color, graphics, or effects to enhance project.
Above Standard

Excellent use of technology to convey thoughts. Color, font, graphics, or effects enhances project. Layout is visually pleasing and is appropriate for topic.
References & Citations

Below Standard/Not Evident

There are no references. If no references are listed, you will receive up to a 20% grade reduction as well for plagiarism.
Approaching Standard

There are less than two sources of information and/or sources are not properly cited and/or the Works Cited page contains many errors.
Meets Standard

Most sources of information use proper citation, and sources are documented and/or the Works Cited page has a few errors.
Above Standard

At least four sources of information are properly cited so that the audience can determine the credibility and authority of the information presented. There are no errors on the Works Cited page.



Keywords:
  • Digital Presentation, communication, bias, facts, media







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202