Skip to main content
iRubric: Central american capital cities project rubric

iRubric: Central american capital cities project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Central american capital cities project 
poster and video about city within a central american country
Rubric Code: TX4A386
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Creation and Content
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

10 pts

Good

20 pts

excellent

30 pts

Use of resources

Poor

Used one source for all information. As a result information colected was irrelvant and simple.
Fair

Didn't use any sources or sources were very limited. Used online sources only.
Good

Only used required amount of sources (3) and their were limited to books and internet.
excellent

Used internet and a variety of other sources that may included but aren't limited to personal interviews, books, encyclopedias, internet, movies, videos, clips to collect relevant and through information about chosen city and country.
references cited

Poor

No references
Fair

References not cited. Information was complied from untrustworthy sources such as Wikepedia , about .com , or other unreference sources were not used. Didn't use any books or printed sources.
Good

Cited most references correctly, references used were from a trustworthy source, organization or institution. Only use one book. Wikepedia , about .com , or other unreference sources were not used
excellent

Cited references correctly, references used were from a trustworthy source, organization or institution. More than one book or printed source was used. Wikepedia , about .com , or other unreference sources were not used
Knowledge gained

Poor

Most information and facts were incorrect, there was no connection made between facts and cultural implications
Fair

Student presented few facts about the country and city of study. There was no connection of information to the cultural practices and perspectives.
Good

Student simply presented facts about the country and city that was studied. Connections of information found to the cultural practices and perspectives were limited. As a result their was very little evidence that the student gained a significant amount of knowledge through the completion of this project.
excellent

student demonstrate the understanding of the practices and how they relate to the perspectives of the cultures studied by relating information in the project to cultural perspectives and practices. Student gave a thorough presentation of the city and country chosen. Evidence of knowldge gained is shown by the student by the information that the student presented.
Poster
Grammar

Poor

Script is incomprehensible because of a wide array of grammatical errors. sentences are short and simple. Sentences are illogical and out of sequence.
Fair

Script contains many grammatical errors, but is still comprehensible. Student didn't build on existing grammatical knowledge. Sentences are short and choppy.
Good

Script contains few grammatical errors Student built on existing grammatical knowledge and extended knowledge as a result.
consistently well written. sentences errors.
excellent

script contains no grammatical errors. Student built on existing grammatical knowledge and extended knowledge as a result.
consistently well written sentences.
Illustrations/Maps

Poor

students didn't have any illustrations or maps.
Fair

student included a map of the country including only the capital city.
Good

student included a map of the country including only the capital city.
excellent

Used words and phrases from the chapter vocabulary and extended vocabulary by using unfamiliar words within the concept areas that were previously introduced in spanish.
use of verbs

Poor

most if not all verbs are in the infinitive form. Most sentences are lacking verbs and/or verbs are placed almost always out of order. verb conjugation affected comprehensibility of the work.
Fair

Few verbs are conjugated correctly.
Ser is in correctly placed in front of many verbs , two conjugated verbs are inappropriately placed in next to each other without a conjunction,
Good

some verbs are correctly conjugated: most verbs agree with subject and are appropriately placed
there are between 5-6 verb conjugation and/or sentence structure issues.
excellent

verbs are correctly conjugated: verbs agree with subject and placed according to the appropriate spanish sentence structure.
originality

Poor

project appeared to be thrown together with very little thought. No rough draft was submitted. scenes were unrelated to project task.
Fair

No props used very little creativity, vocabulary isn't used in a new and creative way. scenes were unrelated to project task.
Good

Creative project incorporated props and various elements into the script.some scenes were random and didn't reinforce vocabulary or project task.
excellent

Superior creativity student used vocabulary and grammar known in a new and creative manner. Props, graphics and various other elements are incorporated into script. scences reinforced vocabulary and were related to the projects task.
Video
Comprehensibility

Poor

couldn't be fully heard and understood. clear and comprehensible. Pronunciation, speaking, intonation, pace and ease of speech were appropriated. Conversation was natural and not robotic.
Fair

More than two instances couldn't weren't :<BR>
be fully hear and understood. clear and comprehensible. Pronunciation, speaking, inntonation, pace and ease of speech were approprioriate. Conversation was natural and not robotic.
Good

at least two instances couldn't weren't
be fully hear and understood. clear and comprehensible. Pronunciation, speaking, intonation, pace and ease of speech were appropriated. Conversation was natural and not robotic.
excellent

students could be fully hear and understood. Spanish was clear and comprehensible. Pronunciation, speaking, inntonation, pace and ease of speech were approrriate. Conversation was natural and not robotic.
Editing

Poor
Fair
Good
excellent

video was clearly edited and has a smooth transition
Information Presentation

Poor

no information was presented. student had photos and music only
Fair
Good

information is not clearly displayed and only one format was used.
excellent

information is clearly presented in the video in a variety of formats such as voice, text, and illustrations.
Accessible media

Poor

unable to play video
Fair
Good
excellent

student presented information in a format that was ready for playback in the class presentation.
presentation
class presentation for posters

Poor

student didn't present or was inattentive to their presentation
Fair
Good
excellent

student present their information fully to the class.
audience member( all students

Poor

student used electronics, played music or disrupted on more than one occasion during the presentation
Fair
Good
excellent

student was quiet during the presentation of others. Student was attentive.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60