Skip to main content

iRubric: NetNeutralityDebate rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
NetNeutralityDebate 
Watson Debate
This rubric will be used to grade a six week project culminating in a debate on whether or not to repeal the net neutrality laws that were adopted in March of 2015
Rubric Code: TX427WA
By dbinkley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Basic Stamp Project
A microprocessor project.
  Poor

10 pts

Fair

20 pts

Good

30 pts

Great

40 pts

Documentation

This item refers to the documentation required for the project. Including calendar, and all appropriate speeches and questions.
Poor

Less than six required documents are present and written poorly, length requirements not met, no citations.
Fair

All documents are present, but poorly written, do not meet length requirements, resources not cited.
Good

At least six of the required documents are present and well written length requirements are met and references cited.
Great

All documents are present and well written, minimum length requirements are met and bibliography is complete, and references are cited.
Preparation

Poor

No apparent preparation.
Fair

Some preparation was apparent, however most students had trouble answering questions and rebuttals.
Good

Most of the students were well prepared and able to answer questions and rebuttals.
Great

All students seemed well prepared and were able to answer questions, and cross examinations reasonably.
Argument

Poor

Only one or two arguments, not supported not cited.
Fair

Few weakly supported arguments, no citations, information not from valid source.
Good

Several arguments but not well supported by valid information or citations.
Great

Several strong appropriate arguments well supported with valid information and citations.
Rebuttal

Poor

No factual evidence presented, completely opinion-based, not respectful of other team.
Fair

Very opinionated and emotional few facts were presented, not well related to oppositions arguments. Generally respectful of other team, some slights.
Good

Some factual evidence was presented, delivery was emotional. Some points related to oppositions arguments. Showed respect for opposite side.
Great

Rebuttal was well formed and related to opposite sides arguments. Facts were clearly presented without emotion. Showed respect for opposite side.
Cross Examinations

Poor

Only one team member very engaged. Questions were not relevant. Very emotional responses, not effective use of time.
Fair

Most team members participated. Questions were not always clearly asked, some off topic. Had difficulty with time management. Was mostly respectful to other team.
Good

Each team member participated. Most question were on topic and well formed. Some difficulty articulating. Showed some emotion but was respectful to other team.
Great

Each team member participated. All questions were on topic and well formed. Used the time effectively. Showed little emotion and respectful to other team.
Team Work

This component represents how well the team worked together.
Poor

Very little team work was observed, and project was not entirely completed.
Fair

Some team work was observed. Most of the work was completed by one project member. Almost completed project.
Good

Group did very well working as a group, work was well divided. However project was not completed in the time frame.
Great

All group members shared work equally. Work was entirely completed according to deadlines.
Personal Reflection/Individual

This component represents the portion of the grade on an individual basis.
Poor

No personal reflection done. Little work completed on project
Fair

Short paragraph only addressed one or two required components. Completed some assigned tasks.
Good

Personal reflection was well written all components were present. Did not complete all assigned tasks.
Great

Personal reflection was well written with all required components. Individual work was completed as assigned.



Keywords:
  • debate, watson, intelligence, computer, human, interaction, technology

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178