Skip to main content

iRubric: Literary Analysis: Irony in Medieval Literature rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literary Analysis: Irony in Medieval Literature 
Compare and contrast situational irony between The Pardoner's Tale" and "Federigo's Falcon." Then, discuss examples of dramatic and verbal irony in each story to compare the two stories. In your introduction, be sure to address the idea that Boccaccio influenced Chaucer as well as the concept of a frame tale.
Rubric Code: TBX6B7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Literary Analysis
  1

(N/A)

2

(N/A)

3

(N/A)

4

(N/A)

Introduction

1

Introduction does not introduce required information and does not have the characteristics of an introduction
2

Introduction missing one element
3

- Introduces author<BR>
- Introduces title<BR>
- Introduces thesis: the use of irony in the tale
4

Introduces all elements and is creative and unique.
Thesis

1

Thesis is unclear and unsupported.
2

Thesis is somewhat clear and somewhat supported with concrete details and commentary.
3

Thesis is very clear and strongly supported with concrete details and commentary throughout the essay.
4

Thesis is very clear and well developed. Main points are introduced clearly. Theme is supported throughout with concrete details and appropriate commentary.
Topic Sentences

1

Topic sentences are unclear and merely begin to give details instead of providing a topic.
2

Topic sentences are fairly clear; connection to thesis is not as obvious as it should be.
3

Topic sentences are clear and show some connection to the thesis.
4

Topic Sentences are clear, succinct and connected to the thesis with key words.
Situational irony

1

Body paragraph does not contain concrete details and commentary concerning situational irony in the tale. No text evidence provided.
2

Body paragraph does contain some concrete detail (refers back to an example of the text)and limited commentary (explanation of student's thoughts) of situational irony in the tale.
3

Body Paragraph contains at least two concrete details and is followed by commentary concerning situational irony in the tale. Text evidence is present.
4

Body Paragraph contains at least two concrete details and is followed by commentary concerning situational irony in the tale. Text evidence is present and appropriate.
Dramatic irony

1

Body paragraph does not contain concrete details and commentary concerning dramatic irony in the tale. No text evidence provided.
2

Body paragraph does contain some concrete detail (refers back to an example of the text)and limited commentary (explanation of student's thoughts) of dramatic irony in the tale.
3

Body Paragraph contains at least two concrete details and is followed by commentary concerning dramatic irony in the tale. Text evidence is present.
4

Body Paragraph contains at least two concrete details and is followed by commentary concerning dramatic irony in the tale. Text evidence is present and appropriate.
Verbal irony

1

Body paragraph does not contain concrete details and commentary concerning verbal irony in the tale. No text evidence provided.
2

Body paragraph does contain some concrete detail (refers back to an example of the text)and limited commentary (explanation of student's thoughts) of verbal irony in the tale.
3

Body Paragraph contains at least two concrete details and is followed by commentary concerning verbal irony in the tale. Text evidence is present.
4

Body Paragraph contains at least two concrete details and is followed by commentary concerning verbal irony in the tale. Text evidence is present and appropriate.
Conclusion

1

Does not restate thesis and main points.
2

Restates thesis and main points and does not address Chaucer's main point.
3

Restates thesis and main points, somewhat addresses Chaucer's main point, and reads like the ending of an essay.
4

Restates thesis and main points, completely addresses Chaucer's main point, and reads like the ending of an essay with a unique or creative comment/ending.
Organization

1

Essay and paragraphs do not flow smoothly and logically. No transitions or key words are used to connect ideas.
2

Essays and paragraphs have several awkward spots that impact the flow. Transitions and key words are few and do not help much in connecting ideas.
3

Essay and paragraphs have a few awkward areas. Ideas are well-connected with transitions and key words.
4

Essay and paragraphs flow logically. Ideas are cohesive. Transitions and key words are effectively used.
Spelling and Grammar

1

Many spelling and grammatical errors.
2

2-3 spelling and grammatical errors.
3

0-1 spelling and grammatical errors.
4

Clean and free of spelling and grammatical errors and presents complex use of grammar and vocabulary.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202