Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: French video/presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
French video/presentation
French video/presentation
Students will create a "une bande-annonce" de Candide that will be 5 to 7 minutes in length. The video must include each partner speaking 200 words of French. All members of the team will contribute and participate in the video. You may use others for your video.
Rubric Code:
TAW4B7
By
GoldLissa
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Unit 4
Excellent
5
(N/A)
Good
4
(N/A)
Fair
3
(N/A)
Poor
2
(N/A)
Not Complete
1-0
(N/A)
Plot
Excellent
Script has an indepth, complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end.
Good
Script is complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end.
Fair
Script is complete with a few rough spots; needs more length.
Poor
Script is incomplete with major gaps; length is too short
Not Complete
No script was turned in.
Spelling and Grammar
Excellent
There were hardly any grammatical / spelling errors (1-2)
Good
There were few grammar / spelling errors
(3-4)
Fair
There were many grammar / spelling errors
(5-7)
Poor
There were numerous errors that made it difficult to understand
(8-10)
Not Complete
11 or more errors.
Pronunciation/Dialogue
Excellent
Group is fluent, pronounces all words correctly.<BR>
Uses complex ideas, native-like flow of speech.
Good
In the group almost all words were pronounced correctly with the exception of 1-2 words.<BR>
Uses more complex language, but with pauses or chunks.
Fair
In the group some words were pronounced correctly with the exception of 3-4 words.<BR>
Uses simple sentences.
Poor
In the group many words were pronounced incorrectly. 5-6 words were pronounced incorrectly.<BR>
Language is choppy and disconnected.
Not Complete
7 + words were pronounced incorrectly
Usage
vocabulary and grammar
Excellent
Beyond chapter vocab and used all verb tenses from the chapter.
Good
Voc. words and grammar from the chapter were used
Fair
Only words from the chapter were used and a limited usage of the grammar
Poor
Limited words and grammar from the chapter were used
Not Complete
No words from the chapter were used
Speaking Requirement
Excellent
All members met the speaking requirement
Good
Only some members met the speaking requirement
Fair
Fewer than 2 members met the speaking requirement.
Poor
Only one person met the speaking requirement
Not Complete
None of the group met the speaking requirement.
Video Production Aspects
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Not Complete
(N/A)
Acting & Originality
Excellent
Great clarity, voice projection, no laughing that obscures scene, speaking in complete sentences. Unique and exciting. Oscar worthy material!
Good
Missing one of the previous elements
Fair
Missing two of the previous elements
Poor
Missing more than 2 elements or you can't understand or hear.
Not Complete
Missing all elements.
Use of Technology
Excellent
Excellent editing. Different scenes in film flow together naturally. The overall product is very convincing and well thought out.
Good
Good editing. There is good flow between scenes. The end result is well adapted and convincing.
Fair
Adequate editing. Some aspects of film do not flow together well. The end result is convincing but more direction and fluidity is needed.
Poor
Poorly edited. Film does not flow/not convincing. Parts are hard to understand or lack structure or direction. Not well thought out.
Not Complete
No editing. No movie.
Props
Excellent
Used many detailed props and costumes.
Good
Use of some detailed props and costumes.
Fair
Some limited props and costumes.
Poor
Few props and costumes.
Not Complete
None were used.
Teamwork
Excellent
All members contributed an equal significant role to the film/presentation.
Good
All members contributed to the project, but some members did not play as significant a role in the production as a whole.
Fair
All members al least contributed something. Some members are far less prominent in the production and video than others.
Poor
Not all members contributed to the project. or one or more of the project members contributed almost nothing to the production.
Not Complete
No members contributed to the project.
Rating
Excellent
PG OR G rating
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Complete
Used above a PG or G rating.
Keywords:
Video, French
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.