Skip to main content
iRubric: Special Ed Writing Rubic rubric

iRubric: Special Ed Writing Rubic rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Special Ed Writing Rubic 
This is a rubric that tries to meet the needs of mainstream secondary teachers with special ed inclusion student in their classes.
Rubric Code: TA325
By jedimom
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Special Ed Writing Rubic
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Ideas and Content

Excellent

Ideas are well developed and supported by details. Thesis is clearly stated Primary and Secondary ideas are tied to and support thesis
Good

Ideas are developed and supported by details. Thesis is clearly stated Primary and Secondary ideas are relevant and try to support thesis
Fair

Ideas are presented and explained. Thesis is stated but may be unclear Primary and secondary ideas are present and clearly stated
Poor

Ideas are presented but not explained well. Thesis is unclear Primary and secondary ideas are unclear or may not be present at all.
Organization

Excellent

Correct form is used and enhances the writing. Ideas are grouped together,tied to thesis and enhance meaning. Transitions work well.
Good

Correct form is used. Ideas are grouped together and attempt to enhance meaning. Transitions are basic but clear.
Fair

Correct form is used. Ideas are grouped together. Transitions need improvement.
Poor

Form is obvious, but not entirely correct. Ideas are scattered throughout with no real coherence. Transitions are missing.
Insight

Excellent

Essay shows a complete understanding and thouroghly discusses topic.
Good

Essay suggest understanding but is not thourogh or sophisticated.
Fair

Essay is simplistic and thoughts often unfininished.
Poor

Passage was misread or misunderstood.
Support

Excellent

Support is clear, detailed and easy to follow. Passages appropriate length. Commentary and support are integrated.
Good

Support is clear and easy to follow. Passages appropriate length. Support is followed by comentary.
Fair

Support choppy or difficult to follow. Passages too long. Comentary missing or difficult to understand.
Poor

Support is paraphrased. The writing rambles.
Introduction and Conclusion

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Sentence Fluency

Excellent

Sentences vary in length. Transitions link sentences, paragraphs and ideas. Sentences enhance the structure of the work.
Good

Sentences vary somewhat in length. Some transitions between sentences, paragraphs and ideas.
Fair

Few sentences vary in length. Few transitions between sentences, paragraphs and ideas.
Poor

Sentences do not vary, or relate from one to another. There are few transitions.
Conventions

Excellent

Clearly understands writing conventions. Few if any mistakes
Good

Basic grasp of writing standards is shown. 0-5 mistakes per page.
Fair

Paper contains errors in subject/verb agreement. Errors in pronoun usage. 6-10 mistakes per page.
Poor

Paper contains errors in subject/verb agreement. Errors in pronoun usage. 11-15 mistakes per page.
Word Choice

Excellent

Strong words and descriptions throughout. Words are above average, and used appropriately throughout the work.
Good

Strong words and descriptions used. Some words are above average and used appropriately throughout the work.
Fair

Few sentences vary in length. Few transitions between sentences, paragraphs and ideas. Vocabulary is basic.
Poor

Sentences do not vary, or relate from one to another. There are few transitions. Vocabulary is limited.
Voice

Excellent

Voice of the author is clear and fitting for the type of writingand show personality or author. Voice does not change throughout work. Audience is engaged.
Good

Voice of the author is clear but not entirely fitting for the piece. Voice changes once or twice. Audience is engaged thoughout most of the work.
Fair

Voice of the author is somewhat clear, but changes through out the work for no reason. Audience is somewhat engaged.
Poor

Voice of the author is not clear, but there is a valid attempt at engaging an audience. The audience is rarely engaged.
Presentation

Excellent

Correct font, spacing, text, graphics are included, appropriate and enhance the work. Follows MLA format.
Good

Correct font, spacing, text and graphics are included as requested. They are appropriate and enhance the work. An attempt is made to follow MLA format.
Fair

Correct font, spacing, text and graphics are included as requested. No attempt is made to follow MLA format.
Poor

Font, spacing, text and graphics are not appropriate for the work.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60