Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Special Ed Writing Rubic rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Special Ed Writing Rubic
This is a rubric that tries to meet the needs of mainstream secondary teachers with special ed inclusion student in their classes.
Rubric Code:
TA325
By
jedimom
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Special Ed Writing Rubic
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Ideas and Content
Excellent
Ideas are well developed and supported by details. Thesis is clearly stated Primary and Secondary ideas are tied to and support thesis
Good
Ideas are developed and supported by details. Thesis is clearly stated Primary and Secondary ideas are relevant and try to support thesis
Fair
Ideas are presented and explained. Thesis is stated but may be unclear Primary and secondary ideas are present and clearly stated
Poor
Ideas are presented but not explained well. Thesis is unclear Primary and secondary ideas are unclear or may not be present at all.
Organization
Excellent
Correct form is used and enhances the writing. Ideas are grouped together,tied to thesis and enhance meaning. Transitions work well.
Good
Correct form is used. Ideas are grouped together and attempt to enhance meaning. Transitions are basic but clear.
Fair
Correct form is used. Ideas are grouped together. Transitions need improvement.
Poor
Form is obvious, but not entirely correct. Ideas are scattered throughout with no real coherence. Transitions are missing.
Insight
Excellent
Essay shows a complete understanding and thouroghly discusses topic.
Good
Essay suggest understanding but is not thourogh or sophisticated.
Fair
Essay is simplistic and thoughts often unfininished.
Poor
Passage was misread or misunderstood.
Support
Excellent
Support is clear, detailed and easy to follow. Passages appropriate length. Commentary and support are integrated.
Good
Support is clear and easy to follow. Passages appropriate length. Support is followed by comentary.
Fair
Support choppy or difficult to follow. Passages too long. Comentary missing or difficult to understand.
Poor
Support is paraphrased. The writing rambles.
Introduction and Conclusion
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Sentence Fluency
Excellent
Sentences vary in length. Transitions link sentences, paragraphs and ideas. Sentences enhance the structure of the work.
Good
Sentences vary somewhat in length. Some transitions between sentences, paragraphs and ideas.
Fair
Few sentences vary in length. Few transitions between sentences, paragraphs and ideas.
Poor
Sentences do not vary, or relate from one to another. There are few transitions.
Conventions
Excellent
Clearly understands writing conventions. Few if any mistakes
Good
Basic grasp of writing standards is shown. 0-5 mistakes per page.
Fair
Paper contains errors in subject/verb agreement. Errors in pronoun usage. 6-10 mistakes per page.
Poor
Paper contains errors in subject/verb agreement. Errors in pronoun usage. 11-15 mistakes per page.
Word Choice
Excellent
Strong words and descriptions throughout. Words are above average, and used appropriately throughout the work.
Good
Strong words and descriptions used. Some words are above average and used appropriately throughout the work.
Fair
Few sentences vary in length. Few transitions between sentences, paragraphs and ideas. Vocabulary is basic.
Poor
Sentences do not vary, or relate from one to another. There are few transitions. Vocabulary is limited.
Voice
Excellent
Voice of the author is clear and fitting for the type of writingand show personality or author. Voice does not change throughout work. Audience is engaged.
Good
Voice of the author is clear but not entirely fitting for the piece. Voice changes once or twice. Audience is engaged thoughout most of the work.
Fair
Voice of the author is somewhat clear, but changes through out the work for no reason. Audience is somewhat engaged.
Poor
Voice of the author is not clear, but there is a valid attempt at engaging an audience. The audience is rarely engaged.
Presentation
Excellent
Correct font, spacing, text, graphics are included, appropriate and enhance the work. Follows MLA format.
Good
Correct font, spacing, text and graphics are included as requested. They are appropriate and enhance the work. An attempt is made to follow MLA format.
Fair
Correct font, spacing, text and graphics are included as requested. No attempt is made to follow MLA format.
Poor
Font, spacing, text and graphics are not appropriate for the work.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.