Skip to main content

iRubric: Contextualizing Night Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Contextualizing Night Research Paper 
Research the approved topic. Submit one 2-3 page typed paper, double spaced, 12 point font following MLA guidelines. Include a bibliography citing at least 3 resources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code: T92759
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
  Exceeds Expectations

100 pts

Meets Expectations

90 pts

Working Towards Meeting Expectation

80 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

70 pts

Quality of research
20 pts

Focus Correction Area 1

Exceeds Expectations

--Cited 3 or more sources <BR>
--Sources reliable and properly cited.<BR>
--All information relevant to topic<BR>
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.<BR>
--Research in-depth and beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Meets Expectations

--Cited 3 sources <BR>
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.<BR>
--Most information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Sufficient information provided <BR>
--Research of sufficent depth.
Working Towards Meeting Expectation

--Failed to cite 3 sources <BR>
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.<BR>
--Some information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Information provided to support some elements of topic<BR>
--Surface research.
Does Not Meet Expectations

--Failed to cite sources <BR>
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.<BR>
--Some information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Information provided to support some elements of topic<BR>
--Surface research.
Content
40 pts

Focus Correction Area 2

Exceeds Expectations

--Topic is clear in claim statement<BR>
--Warrant paragraphs which support claim statement are complex, complete, & in-depth.<BR>
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.<BR>
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Meets Expectations

--Claim statement is somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a questionable topic for research.<BR>
--Warrant paragraphs supporting claim statement sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Working Towards Meeting Expectation

--Claim statement too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.<BR>
--Warrant paragraphs supporting claim statement barely sufficient, with no depth or complexity.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Does Not Meet Expectations

--Claim Statement too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.<BR>
--Warrant paragraphs providing support for claim statement insufficient.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Works Cited/Bibliography
15 pts

Focus Correction Area 3

Exceeds Expectations

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- No errors in format or punctuation.
Meets Expectations

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Working Towards Meeting Expectation

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Does Not Meet Expectations

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- More than than 4 errors in format or punctuation
Grammar and Mechanics
15 pts

Focus Correction Area 4

Exceeds Expectations

--Consistent and appropriate voice (NO PERSONAL PRONOUNS).<BR>
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.<BR>
--No spelling errors.<BR>
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
--Meets all style and min/max page requirements
Meets Expectations

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate (1 personal pronouns).<BR>
-- Fairly effective word choice.<BR>
--No more than 2 spelling errors.<BR>
--Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
--Met most style and min/max page requirements
Working Towards Meeting Expectation

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate (more than 1 personal pronoun).<BR>
-- Correct word choice.<BR>
--More than 3 spelling errors. <BR>
--More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Does Not Meet Expectations

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate (excessive use of personal pronouns).<BR>
-- Correct word choice.<BR>
--More than 4 spelling errors. <BR>
--More than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- More than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202