iRubric: STTP Human Right Video rubric

Research is not clearly supported with accurate facts; research may not be relevant; research has only one source not from a subscription database; the 7 research questions may be incomplete; citations are missing.

Research may or may not be clearly supported with accurate facts; research shows a some examples that may or may not be relevant; research may have less than the required two soures, and may not include subscription databases; the 7 research questions may not be fully addressed; citations are missing.

Research is mostly supported with accurate facts; research shows some examples and relevant data; evidence of at least two sources including subscription databases. All 7 research questions are answered with proper citations.

Research is supported with accurate facts; uses multiple and compelling examples and relevant data; exceeds required sources; evidence of thorough research that may extend beyond the library and includes subscription databases. All 7 research questions are clearly answered with proper citations.

It is difficult to figure out the purpose of the presentation. Little or no attempt to provide accurate factual information.
Video is confusing and difficult to follow.

There are a few lapses in focus, but the purpose is fairly clear. An attempt was made to use factual information but it needed more work.

Provides a good amount of factual information early on and maintains focus for most of the presentation. Content creates a tone that matches all or at least part of the story. A fair amount of research is evident.

Provides accurate factual information on the human rights defender and his/her cause, maintaining a clear focus throughout.
Content creates a distinct tone that matches different parts of the story. Extensive research is evident.

Little or no attempt to use images to support the story.
Poor editing techniques;

Effects, if used, are either irrelevant or distract

The final production full of technical errors.

An attempt was made to use images to illustrate different parts of the story but it needed more work.
Satisfactory editing techniques; Effects sometimes enhance content.
The final production has some errors

Images illustrate some parts of the story.

Strong editing techniques; Good use of effects to enhance content.

The final production has minimal errors.

Images successfully illustrate different parts of the story.

Flawless editing techniques; Exceptional use of effects to enhance content.

The final production is free of technical errors.