Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: WRT 120: Literacy Autobiography rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
WRT 120: Literacy Autobiography
A personal reflection connected to the individual development of the writer.
Rubric Code:
T57W66
By
schmidtp
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Text Feature
Excellent
20 pts
Good
15 pts
Poor
10 pts
A strong voice
Excellent
Experiences are reflected on for their place in literacy development. The focus is analysis, not narration.
Good
Experiences are narrated and occasionally reflected on. The focus switches back and forth from analysis to mere narration.
Poor
The paper has a weak narrative emphasis. The writer tells a story and only minimally reflects on literacy development.
Perspective
Excellent
The paper includes thoughts on reading and writing to learn, from the writer’s perspective as a student.
Good
The paper may not have thoughts on reading AND writing to learn.
Poor
Thoughts on reading and writing to learn may not be present.
Focus
Excellent
Clear description and careful choice of selected reading and writing memories, good or bad, and becoming literate.
Good
It is not obvious why these particular experiences were chosen or how the writer became literate.
Poor
A history of becoming literate may be missing or vague.
Process
Excellent
Writer ACTIVELY participated in the Peer Review Process.
Good
Writer BARELY/partially participated in Peer Review Process.
Poor
Writer did not participate in the Peer Review Process.
Conventions
Excellent
Writing has few or no errors in usage, spelling and punctuation. Sentence structure is varied. Overall, the writing reflects undergraduate student expectations.
Good
Writing has errors in usage, spelling, and/or punctuation. Sentences may be complete but may not flow in readability. The writing is competent but not clearly undergraduate.
Poor
Usage, spelling, and/or punctuation show serious problems and lack of proofreading. Sentences are simple and unvaried. Writing is not at an undergraduate level.
Subjects:
English
Education
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.