Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Ancient Egypt Research Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Ancient Egypt Research Paper
Ancient Egypt Research Paper
Research the approved topic. Submit 2-3 typed pages of publishing the results of your research. Include a Works Cited page with at least 3 sources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, and relevance of included information. Grade will be based on organization, clarity, use of transitions, appropriate voice, correct citation format, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
Rubric Code:
T56A38
By
meliemouse
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Mini Research Paper
Partial Understanding
10 pts
Acceptable
15 pts
Good
20 pts
excellent
25 pts
Quality of research
Partial Understanding
--1 or no sources used--Source reliablility questionable.
--Little information relevant to topic.
--Minimal research.
Acceptable
--Failed to use least 2 sources
--Source reliability questionable.
--Some information relevant to topic.
--Information provided to support topic.
--Surface research.
Good
--used 2-3 sources
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant to topic.
--Research of sufficent depth.
excellent
--used 4-5 sources
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information relevant to topic.
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Content
Partial Understanding
--Topic unclear or non-existent.
--Or, support for topic insufficient,
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent.
Acceptable
--Support for topic barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity.
Good
--Topic stated clearly.
--Reseach support for topic sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity.
excellent
--Topic clear.
--Research support for topic complex, complete, & in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject.
--Clear, appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Grammar and Mechanics
Partial Understanding
-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--Many errors in agreement, pronouns, or tense.
-- Many errors in punctuation or capitalization errors.
Acceptable
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--Few spelling errors.
--Few errors in agreement, pronouns or tense.
-- Few punctuation or capitalization errors.
Good
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns or tense.
-- Very few punctuation or capitalization errors.
excellent
--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Font & Readability
Partial Understanding
--Paper is typed but is using an improper font that is difficult to read or is too large.
OR the paper is yped in differing fonts and font sizes
Acceptable
Paper is typed using an improper font but it is still readable or the font is large but not too big
Good
Paper is typed using an improper font that is readable and the font size is appropriate for a research paper
excellent
Paper is typed in 12 point Times New Roman or Arial font
Follows MLA format
Partial Understanding
Doesn't show any signs of understanding the MLA format.
--Did not double space text.
--Did not include a bibliography page.
--No paragraph indentation.
Acceptable
Shows minimal signs of understanding the MLA format.
-- Some text is double spaced, but doesn't show much consistency.
-- Bibliograpy page does not follow format.
-- Indents paragraphs, but not poperly.
Good
Shows a good understanding of the MLA format.
-- Most text is double spaced.
-- Paragraphs are indented, but not spaced properly.
--bibliography page resembles format.
excellent
Clear understanding of the MLA format.
-- Entire report is double spaced.
--All paragraphs are properly indented.
--bibliography page is double spaced and arranged in alphabetical order, following format.
--Paragraphs are indented and spaced properly.
Keywords:
Research paper - emphasis on process of paper writing
Subjects:
English
History
Humanities
Psychology
Science
Vocational
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.