Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Literary Analysis Comp/Contrast Essay Draft Peer Revision rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Literary Analysis Comp/Contrast Essay Draft Peer Revision
Literary Analysis Essay Draft Peer Revision
Rubric Code:
T53839
By
mcoates2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Peer Revision
Poor
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Great
(N/A)
Focus/Comprehension
Poor
Vaguely identifies similarities and/or differences, argued meaning, and suggested PODs. Non-related topics were introduced.
Fair
Connects similarities and/or differences to meaning but showed little depth or explanation in PODs. No developed focus to the paper.
Good
Understands thesis/PODs and stayed on track. The overall depth of analysis was appropriate but could be deeper or more explicit.
Great
Obviously understands thesis/ PODs. Stayed on track but brought new ideas. Deep, explicit, appropriate analysis for narrow topics of thesis.
Introduction
Poor
Opening sentences but thesis missing/ out-of-place. OR Lacks major & appropriate PODs for body. Unclear what essay will be about. OR Lacks an introduction.
Fair
Could contain vague or poorly worded thesis with introduction. Lists one or two PODs for body, or PODs do not relate to the thesis. Basic understanding of paper.
Good
Contains a thesis with an introduction and lists three PODs to be in body.
Basically clear what this paper is going to be about.
Great
Contains developed introduction and thesis and summarizes significant number of appropriate points to be discussed in body.
Clear paper .
Body Paragraphs
Poor
Does not include sufficient info to develop points. Body paragraphs lack topic sentences which include elements of the thesis. There are one or fewer specific supporting details in all paragraphs with little relevancy to thesis. No quotes were used/cited.
Fair
Includes some inform to develop points in paragraphs. Some body paragraphs lack topic sentences which include some elements of the thesis. One or fewer specific supporting details in all paragraphs with little relevancy to thesis. Inadequate or inappropriate quotes were used or cited.
Good
Includes info for significant amount of PODs in paragraphs. Topic sentences are present, but need refinement. Each paragraph has at least two relevant, supporting details , and serve as evidence in relation the thesis. Analysis supports thesis. Quotes are embedded and cited.
Great
Includes info for significant amount of PODs in paragraphs. Each point has at least one paragraph with topic sentence that connects to the thesis. Several supporting details in development and sufficent analysis to tie to thesis. Some quotes skillfully embedded, cited.
Conclusion
Poor
Thesis points are not restated. Sentences to sum up points of paper are not included.
Fair
Thesis missing but PODs summarized OR thesis restated and PODs not mentioned.
Good
Thesis is restated as well as the three PODs.
Great
Thesis is restated in a unique way, as well as the three PODs. Extra insight is added to the paper.
Mechanics
Poor
Frequent, elementary spelling, sentence structure, and grammatical errors; paragraphs are not varied; transitions absent/poorly used; paper is difficult to understand due to errors.
Fair
Frequent spelling, sentence structure, and grammatical errors; paragraphs have some variation, but not consistently; transitions poorly used; paper is sometimes difficult to understand due to errors.
Good
Minimal spelling, sentence structure, and grammar errors; paragraphs have variation; transitions used appropriately; paper almost always understandable and clear due to appropriate application of rules of Standard English.
Great
Rare spelling, sentence structure, and grammar errors; most errors are due to complex structures, difficult vocabulary. Paragraphs have skillful variations; transitions used purposefully; paper very understandable, clear due to appropriate application of rules of Standard English.
Subjects:
English
Test Preparation
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.