Skip to main content

iRubric: Athletic Training Advocacy Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Athletic Training Advocacy Presentation Persuasive Advocacy Letter Students are presenting to a local school board on the advantages or hiring an athletic. their goal is to convince the Board to vote to hire either a full time athletic trainer for the district or contract through an outreach athletic training program. Rubric Code: T3CC58 By menegonism Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Advocacy Presentation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Format	Poor At the beginning of the presentation the student completes 1 of 4 format components. Then at closing completes 1 of 4 also.	Fair At the beginning of the presentation the student completes 2 of 4 format components. Then at closing completes 2 of 4 also.	Good At the beginning of the presentation the student completes 3 of 4 format components. Then at closing completes 3 of 4 also.	Excellent At the beginning of the presentation the student greets board, introduces self, thanks the members for opportunity to present, and gives introduction to presentation. Then at closing thanks again, presents summary overview, indicates willingness to assist , and asks for questions.
Defines athletic trainer	Poor student does not define what an athletic trainer is	Fair student provides poor definition of what an athletic trainer is and uses inappropriate terminology for audience	Good student has appropriate grasp on what an athletic trainer is but uses inappropriate terminology for audience	Excellent student has good grasp on what an athletic trainer is and uses appropriate terminology for audience
Position	Poor Fails to defend a position with any evidence and fails to address the audience concerns.	Fair Defends a position with little evidence and may address the audience concerns.	Good States and maintains a position, generally defends that position and addresses audience concerns.	Excellent States and maintains a position, authoritatively defends that position and convincingly addresses audience concerns.
Evidence	Poor Advocates without evidence	Fair Advocates without statistical evidence but rather uses anecdotal evidence, examples and illustrations and testimony	Good Advocates through use of some evidence such as statistics (without citations), examples and illustrations and testimony	Excellent Advocates through use of valid evidence such as statistics (with citations), examples and illustrations and testimony
Plan of Action	Poor May provide a weak or unrealistic plan of action that is related to the advocacy cause.	Fair Provides a debatably realistic or appropriate plan of action that is related to the advocacy cause.	Good Provides an appropriate plan of action that is related to the advocacy cause.	Excellent Provides a meaningful plan of action that is responsive to the advocacy cause.
Clearly Extends Ideas	Poor Fails to extend ideas presented in primary or secondary sources through original analysis, evaluation, and elaboration.	Fair Extends some ideas presented in primary or secondary sources through original analysis, evaluation, and elaboration.	Good Extends ideas presented in primary or secondary sources through original analysis, evaluation, and elaboration.	Excellent Clearly extends ideas presented in primary or secondary sources through original analysis, evaluation, and elaboration.
Tone and Focus: Aware of Audience	Poor Demonstrates a lack of tone and focus related to the supposed audience or lacking audience awareness.	Fair Demonstrates an inconsistent tone and focus related to the audience.	Good Consistent tone and focus with a general sense of audience.	Excellent Consistent tone and focus and demonstrates a clear sense of audience.
Language and Conventions	Poor Contains serious errors in conventions and uses limited vocabulary.	Fair Contains several errors in conventions and uses basic and predictable language.	Good Contains some errors in conventions but they do not interfere with reader understanding. Provides some precise language.	Excellent Contains few, if any, errors in conventions. Provides precise and appropriate language.

Subjects:

English

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202