iRubric: Socialization of cross-curricular project rubric

Required number of activities but not related to the required topic.

The activities are related to the required topic but their number is less than it should be

Project is complete and fulfills the parameters (topic and number of activities)

Poor attention and respect for their team-mates while they explain.

Poor attitude and body language.

Some distractions while other team-mates explain but still acceptable.

Acceptable attitude and body language though they could improve (lost sight, seem detached...)

Excellent attention and support of other team-mates during explanations.

Excellent attitude and body language. The whole group seem alert and interested in their team-mates participation.

Level of voice is not appropriate. Ss pay attention to the teacher but not so much to their classmates. They go on even if nobody is paying attention. Poor group control.

Visible effort made to be heard by the group. Though at some points attention of classmates wanders off, they try to get it back.

Excellent voice projection and group control. Even if group get momentarily distracted, the speaker succeeds in getting them back.

Students cannot justify their choice, they just took any one. No signs of negotiation among the group.

Students can explain their choice of topic. They remember it is a mandatory instruction from the MEN.

Excellent explanation. Relation to the needs of the community and the importance of those topics for citizenship and general culture. Mention to MEN

Poor integration of the four skills

Effort done in integrating the skills in the lesson. However it could still be improved.

Excellent integration of the four skills in the lesson.