- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: CONFLICT- Aesthetic Valuing rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
CONFLICT- Aesthetic Valuing Rubric Code: T2XB486 By krishaldavis Draft Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Assessment Grade Levels: (none)

Aesthetic Valuing
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Description	Poor Only one thing or nothing about the artwork is described	Fair Only a few things about the artwork are described.	Good A A basic description was made of the artwork, including: subject, medium and type.	Excellent An in depth description was done on this artwork, including the genre.
Analysis	Poor Only one or none of the elements of art and principles of design are discussed.	Fair Only 2 or 3 elements of art and principles of design are discussed.	Good 4 or 5 of the elements of art and principles of design are discussed.	Excellent All of the elements of art and principles of design are discussed.
Interprutation	Poor A basic and simple meaning was found behind the art.	Fair The art was interrupted and explained with minimal details.	Good The interpretation included an explanation of the meaning and how the art made the student feel	Excellent The interpretation included an explanation of the meaning, how the art made the student feel, the relationship between the meaning and the title and what the piece reminds the student of, if anything.
Judgement	Poor The judgement was simple and not explained.	Fair The judgement included evidence as to why the student came to the conclusion.	Good The judgement included if the artist was successful (why or why not), evidence to support the conclusion	Excellent The judgement included if the artist was successful (why or why not), evidence to support the conclusion, examples of how the artwork could have been changed
Oral Presentation	Poor Student is inaudible and not clear with their presentation. Student did not appear prepared.	Fair Student gave a presentation that had mistakes. Student could have used more time preparing.	Good Student gave a good presentation with just a few mistakes.	Excellent Student gave a clear and concise presentation.