iRubric: Class participation rubric

Talks loosely, sometimes pulling facts from case, theoretical materials and relevant experience, and sometimes not

Draws comments from facts of case and/or talks about articles or relevant experience, but does not integrate across

Analyzes facts of the case and integrates design principles and change management theoretical materials into discussion; provides relevant insights from experience

Repeats perspectives already discussed and/or is unnecessarily long-winded

Sometimes contributes new perspectives and is other times repetitive; is sometimes succinct and other times long-winded

Contributes new perspectives and/or insights and keeps comments to the point succinct

Talks down to people or speaks disrespectfully

Talks with hesitation and uncertainty, disagrees respectfully

Speaks in a collegial tone but with authority, she disagrees respectfully and in a constructive manner

Never takes and defends positions that are different from the positions of others in the class.

Sometimes takes and defends positions that are different from the positions of others in the class.

Frequently takes and defends positions that are different from the positions of others in the class.

Appears disconnected from the conversation, engages in class-unrelated activities, comes late or leaves during the discussion

Engagement ranges from active to inactive but present

Actively involved throughout the class

Rarely speaks OR Dominates the discussion

Talks sometimes

Speaks frequently but does not dominate the conversation