iRubric: Video presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Video presentation Clinical Trial Simulation Video Rubric Code: SXWBA92 By eligon Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Clinical Trial Simulation
	Exceeds 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 4 pts	Missing 0 pts
Speaking	Exceeds Individual speaks clearly, effectively, and loud enough to be easily understood. They efficiently shared information. It is evident that the student prepared what will be said.	Good Individual speaks clearly and presents a good amount of the information expected. May slip up or mumble at times.	Fair There are several confusing moments and the information presented is not completely shared during the presentation. The student has not practiced what is to be said.	Poor No preparation was done for the presentation and the information that is presented lacks many elements of what is expected.	Missing Nothing is presented.
Content	Exceeds Student researched in detail at least 6 pertinent facts about the subject.	Good Student researched at least 4 facts. Or 6 facts, but information is somewhat detailed and relevant.	Fair Information is scattered, unorganized, and is vague, but still has a point.	Poor Information lacks detail, organization, and does not provide any valuable information for group.	Missing Content is irrelevant or missing.
Effort	Exceeds Individual student displayed effort above and beyond expectations.	Good Individual student displayed effort that met the criteria for this project.	Fair Individual student displayed some effort throughout this project.	Poor Individual student was lacking in effort throughout this project.	Missing Not evident.
Organization	Exceeds Student has an intro and credits. Transistions are smooth.	Good Lacks on aspect of organization, or those items are of poor quality.	Fair Lacks more than one aspect of organization, or those items are of poor quality.	Poor Lacks two or more aspects of organization, or those items are of poor quality.	Missing Not evident.
Cinematography	Exceeds Video is well-framed, has appropriate lighting, and subject is easily observed. Work is fluid.	Good Is lacking one aspect of cinematography, or it is of poor quality.	Fair Lacks two aspects of cinematography, or they are of poor quality.	Poor Lacks 3 aspects of cinematography, or they are of poor quality.	Missing Missing
References	Exceeds Citations are listed in proper format. Resources are valid (trustworthy). At least 4 different sources are used.	Good One element is missing.	Fair 2-3 elements are missing.	Poor 4-5 elements are missing.	Missing missing
script	Exceeds Written script is provided with no more than 2 errors in grammar.	Good 3-4 errors in writing.	Fair 5-6 errors in writing.	Poor 7-8 errors in writing,	Missing TMTC