Skip to main content

iRubric: Demonstrations - Fall 2015 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Demonstrations - Fall 2015 
This is the rubric for grading MVP demonstrations in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 09/13 by TV from Oral Presentation Rubric, v2.0, created 09/14 by TV, v3.0, based on Collaboratory MVP evaluation rubric, created 11/15 by TV)
Rubric Code: SX45982
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Oral Presentations
This is the rubric for grading demonstrations in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department.
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Audience Awareness
2 pts

Did the presenter engage the audience? Did they draw out comments from all members of the audience?

Exemplary/Excellent

Presenter did an excellent job of engaging the audience and got every member involved.
Accomplished/Good

Presenter engaged the audience, but not all members of the audience were involved.
Developing/Fair

Presenter minimally engaged the audience and much of the audience was not engaged.
Deficient/Poor

Presenter failed to engage the audience (audience seemed unnecessary) and very little of the audience was engaged.
Appearance and voice
1 pts

•Volume – loud enough
•Clarity – good diction
•Distractors – very few, if any, ums and ers
•Good word choice
•Good eye contact
•Appropriately dressed

Exemplary/Excellent

Meets all six points
Accomplished/Good

Lacks one of the points.
Developing/Fair

Lacks two of the points.
Deficient/Poor

Lacks more than two points.
Tangible Evidence
4 pts

Quality of the tangible evidence presented of work accomplished

Exemplary/Excellent

The work accomplished was clearly explained and the tangible evidence provided clearly proved the quality and completeness of that work.
Accomplished/Good

The work accomplished was clearly explained, but the tangible evidence provided did prove the quality of all the work.
Developing/Fair

The work accomplished was clearly explained, but no tangible evidence was provided to show the quality of the work.
Deficient/Poor

The work accomplished was not clearly explained, and no tangible evidence was provided to show the quality of the work.
Accepting Feedback
2 pts

How did the presenter handle feedback?

Exemplary/Excellent

Presenter clearly appreciated feedback and seemed ready to incorporate feedback into future MVPs.
Accomplished/Good

Presenter accepted feedback.
Developing/Fair

Presenter seemed uninterested in feedback.
Deficient/Poor

Presenter was defensive about feedback.
Answering Questions
2 pts

Were the presenters able to answer questions from the audience?

Exemplary/Excellent

Presenters had clearly thought about all aspects of the project and were able to answer questions well.
Accomplished/Good

Presenters were able to answer all questions satisfactorily.
Developing/Fair

Presenters were able to answer some questions, but did not give good answers to other questions.
Deficient/Poor

Presenters seemed unable to talk about their project in any way other than their prepared talk.



Keywords:
  • IPC, Oral Presentations

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202