iRubric: Updated Final Design Cycle rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Updated Final Design Cycle Updated Final Design Cycle Rubric Code: SX33ACW By edwarca Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 6-8

Criterion A: Investigate
	Poor 0.25 pts	Fair 0.5 pts	Good 1 pts
The Importance of the Problem	Poor You have not explained the importance of the problem	Fair You have inadequately explained the importance of the problem	Good You have explained the importance of the problem.
Design Brief	Poor You have not included a design brief	Fair You have included a design brief but you have left out one or more aspects	Good You have included an entire design brief
Research	Poor You have not included any relevant research	Fair You have included research but have not said why it was useful	Good You have researched information relevant to the project and said why it was useful
Bibliography	Poor You did not cite any sources	Fair You have given your sources credit but failed to cite in MLA format	Good You have included a proper bibliography
Design Specifications	Poor You have not included any design specifications	Fair You have included design specifications but some sections are blank or missing	Good You have included all of the design specifications
Testing your Product	Poor You have not included how you will test your product	Fair You have included a plan on how you will test your product but it is missing parts or non-specific	Good You have described how you will test your final product
Criterion B: Design
	Poor 0.75 pts	Fair 1.25 pts	Good 2 pts
Design Brief	Poor You have not included a Design Brief	Fair You have included a Design Brief but it is incomplete or missing parts	Good You have included a completed Design Brief
Design Specifications	Poor You have not included your Design Specifications	Fair You have included your Design Specifications but they are incomplete	Good You have included completed Design Specifications
Final Design Idea	Poor You have not explained in your Design Journal why you chose your specific Design Idea	Fair You have included an explanation of your Design Idea but it is inadequate or incomplete	Good You have included a complete justification of why you chose your Design Idea
Criterion C: Plan
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 1.75 pts	Good 3 pts
Step-by-Step Plan	Poor You have not included a screenshot of your step by step backward plan for project completion	Fair You have included a screenshot of your step by step backward plan for project completion but it is missing steps	Good You have included a screenshot of your step by step backward plan
Plan Evaluation	Poor You have not included a screenshot of your Planning Self-Evaluation Rubric in your Design Journal	Fair You have included a screenshot of your Planning Self-Evaluation Rubric in your Design Journal but it is not filled out or missing parts	Good You have included a completed Planning Self-Evaluation screenshot in your Design Journal
Criterion D:Create
	Poor 0.5 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 1.5 pts
Creation	Poor You have not followed your plan at all and have not created a final product	Fair You have followed your plan and created a final product but the final product does not match the plan	Good Your final product matches your original plan
Design Journal	Poor You have not made daily journal entries in your design journal	Fair You have made entries in your design journal but they are inadequate or missing days	Good You have accurately documented your creation process in your design journal
Design Changes	Poor You have not explained any changes your made from your original design to your final product	Fair You have explained why you made changes between your original design and final product but it is inadequate or missing parts	Good You have clearly explained changes between your original design and your final product
Product Quality	Poor Your final product is of low quality	Fair Your final product is of fair quality	Good Your final product is of high quality
Criterion E: Evaluate
	Poor 0.5 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 1.5 pts
Evaluation of Design Specifications	Poor You have not evaluated your product against your Design Specifications	Fair You have evaluated your product against your Design Specifications but your evaluation is missing parts or is inadequate	Good You have evaluated your product against your Design Specifications
Reflection	Poor You have not reflected on your own performance	Fair You have reflected on your own performance but parts are incomplete or missing	Good You have clearly reflected on your own performance
Evaluation through Design Cycle	Poor You have not evaluated your work throughout the Design Cycle (Investigate, Plan, Create Rubrics)	Fair You have evaluated your work throughout the design cycle but you are missing one or two criterion (Investigate, Plan, Create Rubrics)	Good You have evaluated your work at every stage of the Design Cycle (Investigate, Plan, Create Rubrics)
Improvements	Poor Upon reflection, you have not suggested any improvements	Fair Upon reflection, you have suggested one improvement	Good Upon reflection, you have suggested one or more improvements
Criterion F: Attitudes in Tech
	Poor 0.75 pts	Fair 1.25 pts	Good 2 pts
Motivated	Poor You should no motivation throughout the project	Fair You should some motivation throughout the project but required prompting	Good You were self-motivated throughout the project and required little to no teacher intervention
Independent Worker	Poor You did not work independently throughout the project	Fair You worked somewhat independently but required teacher redirection throughout the project	Good You worked independently throughout the project
Shows respect for other	Poor You did not show respect for others throughout the project	Fair You showed some disrespect for others throughout the project	Good You were respectful to others throughout the project
Co-operative	Poor You were uncooperative throughout the project	Fair You were somewhat uncooperative throughout the project	Good You were cooperative throughout the project
Safe Worker	Poor You violated multiple saftey protocols throughout the project	Fair You violated one safety protocol during the project	Good You worked safely and adhered to safety protocols throughout the project
Positive Attitude	Poor You demonstrated a negative attitude throughout the project	Fair You had an indifferent attitude throughout the project	Good You demonstrated a positive attitude throughout the project

Keywords:

IB, MYP, Technology, Design

Subjects:

Computers

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric