Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Multimodal Reflection Paper & Project Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Multimodal Reflection Paper & Project Rubric
This rubric will be used to grade both the multimodal project and the accompanying reflection paper.
Rubric Code:
SX2C46W
By
ClaudiaH
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Multimodal Project/Reflection
Proficient
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very poor
0 pts
Writing Style
Proficient
The Reflection write-up adheres to page requirements and MLA Style (Times New Roman, 12 pt font, edited for spelling and grammar errors, double spaced, uses complete paragraphs). The student includes an introduction with a clear thesis statement and two to three points to support it (blueprint of reason). All sources (pictures included) are cited in the reflection and in the bibliography.
Fair
The Reflection write-up adheres to page requirements & MLA Style but it is missing one or two of the following elements: Times New Roman, 12 pt font, edited for spelling and grammar errors, double spacing & uses complete paragraphs. The student includes an introduction with a thesis statement that is discernible though flawed. It includes two to three points to support thesis (blueprint of reason). Most sources (pictures included) are cited in the reflection and in the bibliography.
Poor
The Reflection write-up does not adhere to page requirements & MLA Style. The student may or may not include an introduction with a thesis statement that is discernible though flawed. It includes two to three points to support thesis (blueprint of reason). Few sources (pictures included) are cited in the reflection and in the bibliography.
Very poor
The student did not include a Reflection write-up or only gives 1/2 page write up that lacks complete sentences, is not edited and does not adhere to MLA Style. There is not intro or no thesis. Sources (pictures included) are not cited in the reflection and/or in the bibliography (this is interpreted as plagiarism and leads to automatic F grade).
Ability to reason
Proficient
It is evident that this work is based on research (e.g., quotes support student's main points, the visuals selected are justified based on information learned from readings or fieldwork (e.g., interviews, participant observation). The visuals communicate the ideas presented in the paper.
Fair
It is evident that this work is based on research (e.g., quotes support student's main points, the visuals selected are justified based on information learned from readings or fieldwork (e.g., interviews, participant observation). The visuals created are communicate part of the ideas presented in the paper.
Poor
The student provides only a brief discussion that lacks detail of why s/he created the type of project. It is not completely evident that this work is based on research (e.g., quotes support student's main points, the visuals selected are justified based on information learned from readings or fieldwork (e.g., interviews, participant observation). The visuals selected only partially communicate the ideas presented in the paper.
Very poor
The project lacks a research basis or it relies slavishly on personal knowledge or opinion. The visuals selected do not communicate the ideas presented in the paper.
Purpose
Proficient
Both the visual project and the reflection discuss/convey purpose. It is clear why the topic was chosen, its importance to the student as well as her/his intent to inform, incite or entertain. The project has a clear intended audience.
Fair
The visual project conveys purpose, but the reflection only offers a partial discussion. It is somewhat clear why the topic was chosen, its importance to the student as well as her/his intent to inform, incite or entertain. The project has an intended audience, but it is too general or broad.
Poor
The visual project conveys purpose, but the reflection does not or visa versa. It is somewhat clear why the topic was chosen and its importance to the student but her/his intent to inform, incite or entertain is lacking. The project lacks an intended audience, or it is too general or broad.
Very poor
Neither the project or the reflection conveys or discuses purpose or if it does it is very brief or does not make sense. It is not clear why the topic was chosen and its importance to the student and her/his intent to inform, incite or entertain is lacking. The project lacks an intended audience.
Creativity
Proficient
The project takes a unique and interesting approach to discussing the topic. The visuals created are interesting and well rendered. Visuals cited are arranged in a catchy or thought provoking manner.
Fair
The project takes a mostly unique and interesting approach to discussing the topic. The visuals created are somewhat interesting, but well rendered. Visuals cited are arranged in a catchy or thought provoking manner.
Poor
The project does not take a unique and interesting approach to discussing the topic. The visuals created are somewhat interesting but may or may not be well rendered. Visuals cited are arranged in a catchy or thought provoking manner.
Very poor
The project does not take a unique and interesting approach to discussing the topic. The visuals created are not interesting, and they are not well rendered. Visuals cited are not arranged in a catchy or thought provoking manner.
Annotated Biliography
Proficient
The student included 3 or more annotations complete with author info, a statement on the intended audience and the type of information the source represents. Also includes a statement on how the source illuminates the student's work. Wikipedia is not a primary source and it is evident that the student did library research not simply google searches.
Fair
The student included 3 mostly complete annotations. S/he may lack one or more of the following: author info, a statement on the intended audience and the type of information the source represents, and a statement on how the source illuminates the student's work. Wikipedia is not a primary source. The student did library research but may have relied more on sources from google searches.
Poor
The student included 3 or less sources. S/he may have only annotated 1 source or only partially added annotations. Wikipedia was used as primary source and/or work relies slavishly on sources generated from google search. No items from library or databases are included or if they are included, it is unclear how they were applied.
Very poor
The student does not include a bibliography or annotated bibliography.
Presentation
Proficient
The presentation is no more than 3 minutes long. The student is well prepared. S/he shares his/her work with confidence, a clear tone of voice that is able to be heard in the back of the room and looks out at audience rather than only at Prof or the computer screen.
Fair
The presentation is no more than 3 minutes long. The student is prepared. S/he shares his/her work with a clear tone of voice, but lacks some confidence and in turn refers too much to the notes on the powerpoint.
Poor
The presentation is under 3 minutes or goes over time. The student seems unprepared/lacking confidence; s/he constantly reads from screen, her voice fluctuates or is hard to hear.
Very poor
The student does not present, either due to refusal, tardiness or absence.
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.