Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Panel Discussion Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Panel Discussion Rubric
Rubric Code:
S95995
By
BBrody
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Political Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Panel Discussion
Enter rubric description
Fair
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Excellent
(N/A)
Opening Statement
30 points maximum
Fair
0-19
Opening statement lacked in substance.
Opening statement lacked in clarity.
Opening statement needed significant increase in analytical rigor.
Good
20-24
Good opening statement.
Some strong arguments presented.
Needed more organization.
Needed a higher level of analysis.
Needed more substance.
Excellent
25-30
Strong opening statement.
Topical and substantive arguments.
Well organized and presented arguments.
High level of analytical rigor.
Clarity
10 points Maximum
Fair
0-5
Arguments lacked clarity.
Many points were inconsistent.
Did not effectively clarify points/arguments during the discussion.
Good
6-7
Could have better clarified your arguments for the group.
Some arguments were not consistent.
Good clarification of your points during the discussion.
Excellent
8-10
Excellent job in this area.
Clear and intelligible arguments.
Excellent clarification of your points within the discussion.
Argumentation/Style
10 points maximum
Fair
0-5
Need more engagement with the larger discussion.
Need work in this area.
Good
6-7
Good job in this area.
Argumentation could have been more sophisticated.
Good engagement with the larger discussion.
Excellent
8-10
Excellent job in this area.
Persuasive argumentation.
Excellent engagement with the larger discussion.
Position Paper
50 points maximum
Fair
0-39
The paper lacked in substance.
The paper lacked in clarity.
The paper lacked in organization.
Good
40-49
Paper could have been improved in terms of substance.
Paper could have been improved in terms of clarity.
Paper could have been improved in terms of organization.
Excellent
45-50
Clear substantive and organized paper.
Subjects:
Political Science
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Political Science rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.