Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Literature review rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Literature review
Literature review
A literature review rubric for general use in graduate programmes
Rubric Code:
S93XA2
By
p000001
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
INTRODUCTION
20 %
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Problem statement
Poor
Neither implicit nor explicit reference is made to the topic or purpose of the article
Fair
Readers are aware of the overall problem, challenge, or topic of the article
Good
The topic is introduced, and groundwork is laid as to the direction of the article
BODY
50 %
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Flow of the review
Poor
The literature review appears to have no direction, with subtopics appearing disjointed.
Fair
There is a basic flow from one section to the next, but not all sections or paragraphs follow in a natural or logical order
Good
The literature review goes from general ideas to specific conclusions. Transitions tie sections together, as well as adjacent paragraphs
Coverage of content
Poor
Major research contributors are missing. Too much focus on one or two research articles.
Fair
A wide range of sources have been identified and used. Sources are fairly reported on.
Good
The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. Significance to the course is unquestionable.
Clear writing
Poor
It is hard to know what the writer is trying to express. Writing is convoluted. Misspelled words, incorrect grammar, and improper punctuation are evident.
Fair
Writing is generally clear, but unnecessary words are occasionally used. Meaning is sometimes hidden. Paragraph or sentence structure is too repetitive. Few (3) spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are made.
Good
Writing is crisp, clear, and succinct. The writer incorporates the active voice when appropriate and supports ideas with examples. No spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are made.
CONCLUSION
20 %
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Conclusion
Poor
There is no indication the author tried to synthesize the information or make a conclusion based on the literature under review.
Fair
The author provides concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the conclusions, however, were not supported in the body of the report.
Good
The author was able to make succinct and precise conclusions based on the review. Insights into the problem are appropriate.
REFERECES
10 %
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
APA referencing
Poor
Citation for the article did not follow APA format and was missing essential information
Fair
Citation for the article did follow APA format; however; a few (2) errors in essential information were evident
Good
Citation for the article did follow APA format. Essential information was accurate and complete.
Keywords:
Literature review, graduate
Subjects:
Education
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.