Skip to main content
iRubric: SGA Officer rubric

iRubric: SGA Officer rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
SGA Officer 
Evaluate student officers to measure their level of dedication.
Rubric Code: S77C9A
By marystevens95
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Political Science  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Excellent

5 pts

Above Average

4 pts

Average

3 pts

Below Average

2 pts

Low

1 pts

Very Low

0 pts

Weighted GPA

Excellent

4.5+-4.0
Above Average

3.9-3.5
Average

3.4-3.0
Below Average

2.9-2.5
Low

2.4-2.0
Very Low

Below 2.0
Critical Thinking/Decision Making

Excellent

-Student is knowledgeable about the decision making and problem solving process with little or no adult guidance. Results are evident and used to continue the process
-Proactively analyzes and diagnoses problems and addresses them with creative solution
Above Average

-Student is knowledgeable about the decision making and problem solving process. Decisions are discussed, evaluated, and followed through with minimal adult guidance. Results are evidence
-Has capacity to develop and sustain long term strategic plans with effective solutions.
Average

-Student is knowledgeable about decision making process but have difficult getting results. Seeks adult guidance often.
-Makes appropriate decisions based on policies, students, and data.
Below Average

-Student is beginning to utilize a process of decision making with adult encouragement.
Low

-Student has minimal knowledge of the the decision making and problem solving process
Very Low

-Student is not knowledgeable of the decision making and problem solving process.
Student Engagement

Excellent

-Moderate level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.
Above Average

-Sporadic level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.
Average

-High level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.
Below Average

-Extremely high level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.
Low

-Minimal level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.
Very Low

-Low level of student participation within other clubs and organizations
Popular Votes

Excellent

-Student received the majority of popular votes from the student body.
Above Average

-Student received the second highest amount of popular votes from the student body.
Average

-Student received the third highest amount of popular votes from the student body.
Below Average

-Student received the fourth highest amount of popular votes from the student body.
Low

-Student received the fifth highest amount of popular votes from the student body.
Very Low

-Student received the sixth highest amount of popular votes from the student body.
Ability to Prioritize

Excellent

-Student has developed habits of consistently relying on a schedule planning system that integrates time and task management to effectively minimize interruptions and maximize productivity and punctuality.
Above Average

-Student uses a daily calendar system that is integrated with their task management system. It may lack consistency and be limited in scope
Average
Below Average

-Student uses a month to month calendar to note major events
Low

-Student uses a system of lists that are accessible
Very Low

-Student has no means of tracking tasks, projects, or daily priorities
Communication Skills

Excellent

-Utilizes online communication to further their study, ask and answer questions, and go beyond the confines of the classroom.
Above Average

-Articulates
-Presents ideas clearly
-Shows skill in dealing with difficult or delicate situations, keeping other's feelings in mind
Average

-Present self with composure
-Breaks things down on everyone's level
-Avoid vague words
Below Average

-Ask questions for clarification
-Has good social skills
-Controls thought flow and speech
Low

-Listens before speaking
-Speaks at an appropriate volume
-Gives everyone a chance to speak
Very Low

-Fails to maintain audience's attentions
-Seldom makes eye contact with intended audience
-Pays attention to speaker(s)
Interview

Excellent

-Student was professionally dressed, and exhibited excellent manners.
-All questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.
Above Average

-Student was professionally dressed, and exhibited excellent manners.
-Most questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.
Average

-Student was professionally dressed, and exhibited acceptable manners.
-Few questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.
Below Average

-Student was NOT professionally dressed for a job interview.
-All questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.
Low

-Student was NOT professionally dressed for a job interview.
-Most questions were answered appropriately and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.
Very Low

-Student was NOT professionally dressed for a job interview.
-Few questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.



Keywords:
  • Student government rubric, interview, prioritize, communication skills, student engagement, critical thinking


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60