Skip to main content
iRubric: Graphic Organizer CNUR104 generic rubric

iRubric: Graphic Organizer CNUR104 generic rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Graphic Organizer CNUR104 generic 
This rubric is the generic version that will be modified somewhat for each of 3 in-class small group assignments in the Health Education Across the Lifespan course
Rubric Code: S6639X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Graphic Organizer
  outstanding

An outstanding performance with very strong evidence of:
•an insightful and comprehensive grasp of the subject matter;
•a clear ability to make sound and original critical evaluation of the material given;
•outstanding capacity for original creative and/or logical thought;
•an excellent ability to organize, to analyze, to synthesize, to integrate ideas, and to express thoughts both in speech and in writing.

(N/A)

very good

Very good performance with strong evidence of:
•a comprehensive grasp of the subject matter;
•an ability to make sound critical evaluation of the material given;
•a good capacity for original, creative, and/or logical thinking;
•a very good ability to organize, to analyze, to synthesize, to integrate ideas, and to express thoughts both in speech and in writing.

(N/A)

above average

Above average performance with evidence of:
•a substantial knowledge of the subject matter;
•a good understanding of the relevant issues and a good familiarity with the relevant literature and techniques;
•some capacity for original, creative, and/or logical thinking;
•an above-average ability to organize, to analyze and to examine the subject material in a critical and constructive manner, and
•to express thoughts both in speech and in writing.

(N/A)

generally satisfactory

A generally satisfactory and intellectually adequate performance with evidence of:
•an acceptable basic grasp of the subject material;
•a fair understanding of the relevant issues;
•a general familiarity with the relevant literature and techniques;
•an ability to develop solutions to moderately difficult problems related to the subject material;
•a moderate ability to examine the material in a critical and analytical manner, and to express thoughts in writing.

(N/A)

barely acceptable

A barely acceptable performance with evidence of:
•a familiarity with the subject material;
•some evidence that analytical skills have been developed;
•some understanding of relevant issues;
•some familiarity with the relevant literature and techniques;
•partially successful attempts to solve moderately difficult problems related to the subject material and to examine the material in a critical and analytical manner;
•basic competence in writing.

(N/A)

unacceptable

Unacceptable performance

(N/A)

Concept arrangement

outstanding

-Clear identification of main concept
-sub-concepts branch from main concept in a logical and appropriate manner
very good

Clear identification of main concept
-1 subcategory does not branch out from main concept in a logical and appropriate manner
above average

-Central concept easily identified
-2 sub-categories do not branch from main concept
generally satisfactory

-Central concept identifiable with effort
-3 subcategories do not branch out from main concept
barely acceptable

-Main concept not easily identified
- >3 subcategories dos not branch out from main concept
unacceptable

-Main concept not easily identified
-Subcategories do not branch from main concept in a logical or consistent manner
Links and relationships

outstanding

-Lines to link related terms points in the correct direction
-accurate terminology used to describe the relationship between terms
very good

-1 line to link related terms does not point in the correct direction
-accurate terminology used to describe the relationship between terms
above average

-2 lines to link related terms do not point in the correct direction
-Mostly accurate terminology used to describe the relationship between terms and has 1 error
generally satisfactory

-3 lines to link related terms do not point in the correct direction
-2 errors in terminology used to describe the relationship between terms
barely acceptable

->3 lines to link related terms do not point in the correct direction
->2 terminology used to describe the relationship between terms
unacceptable

-Lines to link related terms do not always points in the correct direction
-Inaccurate or confusing terminology used to describe the relationship between terms
Content

outstanding

-Contains all of the essential information and no unnecessary information
-concise and logical presentation of concepts
very good

-Contains all of the essential information and has 1 piece of unnecessary information
-concise and logical presentation of concepts
above average

-Missing 1 piece of the essential information and has 1 piece of unnecessary information
-1 non-concise and illogical presentation of concepts , some unnecessary content
generally satisfactory

-Missing 2 pieces of essential information and has one piece of unnecessary information
-1 non-concise and illogical presentation of concepts , some unnecessary content
barely acceptable

-Missing> 2 pieces of essential information and has 2 pieces of unnecessary information
-2 non-concise and illogical presentation of concepts , some unnecessary content
unacceptable

-Missing essential information and contains unnecessary information
-wordy and illogical presentation of concepts, some irrelevant concepts
Design & Text

outstanding

-No spelling, grammar, punctuation, or use and mechanics of English errors
-Color used effectively
-Pleasing to the eye
-Simple and uncluttered
-Easy to read, text is appropriate size
very good

-2 spelling, grammar, punctuation, or use and mechanics of English errors
-Color used effectively
-Pleasing to the eye
-Simple and uncluttered
-Easy to read, text is appropriate size
above average

-3 spelling, grammar, punctuation, or use and mechanics of English errors
-Color mostly used effectively
-Pleasing to the eye
-Simple and uncluttered
-Easy to read, text is appropriate size
generally satisfactory

-4 spelling, grammar, punctuation, or use and mechanics of English errors
-Color not effectively used
-Pleasing to the eye
-Cluttered
-Mostly easy to read, text is appropriate size
barely acceptable

->4 spelling, grammar, punctuation, or use and mechanics of English errors
-Color not effectively used
-Not pleasing to the eye
-Cluttered
-Not easy to read, text is inappropriate size
unacceptable

-Contains >5 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or use and mechanics of English
-Color not used effectively
-Not pleasing to the eye
-Cluttered
-Not easy to read, text is inappropriate size
Oral Presentation

outstanding

-Speaks clearly and audibly, no mistakes in pronunciation
-Shows interest in topic
-Stays on topic
-Calm and relaxed
-Appropriately paced

-Makes frequent eye contact with audience
-Familiar with material, does not read verbatim
-does not chew gum
-no distracting mannerisms or vocalizations
very good

-Speaks clearly and audibly, 1 mistake in pronunciation
-Shows interest in topic
-Strays off topic x1
-Calm and relaxed
-Appropriately paced
-Makes intermittent eye contact with audience
-Familiar with material, does not read verbatim
-does not chew gum
-no distracting mannerisms or vocalizations
above average

-Speaks clearly and audibly, 2 mistakes in pronunciation
-Shows interest in topic
-Strays off topic x1
-Calm and relaxed
-Pace varies to too fast or too slow
-Makes intermittent eye contact with audience
-Mostly familiar with material, does not read verbatim
-does not chew gum
-no distracting mannerisms or vocalizations
generally satisfactory

-Speaks clearly and audibly, 4 mistakes in pronunciation
-Shows little interest in topic-Strays off topic x2
-Mostly calm and relaxed
-Inappropriately paced
-Makes little eye contact with audience
-Mostly familiar with material, read verbatim reads verbatim 25% of the time
-does not chew gum
-1 distracting mannerisms or vocalizations
barely acceptable

-Mostly speaks clearly and audibly, > 4 mistakes in pronunciation
-Shows no interest in topic
-Strays off topic >2
-Nervous with several distracting mannerisms
-Inappropriately paced
-Makes little eye contact with audience
-Not familiar with material, reads verbatim 50% of the time
-does not chew gum
-1 distracting mannerisms or vocalizations
unacceptable

Does not speak clearly and audibly
Shows no interest in topic
-Nervous, several distracting mannerisms
-Chews gum
-Too fast paced
-Makes no eye contact with audience, reads from paper




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232