Skip to main content

iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Virtual Poster: Student Body rubric

home » rubrics » iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Virtual Poster: Student Body rubric » 
find rubric
Missouri FCCLA Virtual Poster: Student Body 
This rubric is for the Missouri FCCLA state contest, Virtual Poster: Student Body. The contest is open to Missouri FCCLA members only. Information found at www.mofccla.org

Powered by iRubric Missouri FCCLA Virtual Poster
Participants publish a virtual, interactive digital poster using Glogster EDU. The virtual poster will address an issue related to the Student Body units - Eat Right, Be Fit, and Make Healthy Choices. The virtual poster will include a video of the participant presenting their project to an audience.
 

0 pts


1 pts


2 pts


3 pts


4 pts

Student Body Topics
If project did not meet the topic requirement, it can be scored but will receive an automatic 10 point deduction, to be deducted from the final score.
Video Specification
If video did not meet the time specification, it can be scored but will receive an automatic 5 point deduction, to be deducted from the final score.
Project Identification Page
0.5 pts

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

Not included.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

Included but missing one or more requirements.
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

Includes participant first name/last initial, school, city, state, FCCLA region, title of project.
Use of FCCLA Planning Process
1 pts

A summary page of the planning process must be posted on the website, wiki, or linked from the poster.
0 ( x 1 pts)

Not included.
1 ( x 1 pts)

1 or 2 steps summarized. Planning process relationship to project is weak.
2 ( x 1 pts)

3 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are generally reflected in project.
3 ( x 1 pts)

4 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are seen in project.
4 ( x 1 pts)

All 5 steps summarized. Planning process completed and relates to project.
Idea Organization
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas not organized.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas lack coherence and not well organized.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas mostly coherent but not clearly organized.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas most coherent and organized.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas coherent and effectively organized.
Poster Subject Knowledge
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is not evident.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is not evident, information is confusing, incorrect, or insufficient.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is evident but information is confusing or insufficient.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is evident, most information is clear, appropriate and accurate.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Subject knowledge is clearly evident. All information is clear, appropriate and accurate.
Poster Creativity and Design
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No use of color, design, or effects to support the theme of the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Color, design, effects distract from the topic. Originality is absent.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Minimal use of color, design, effects and original ideas. Topic not well supported.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Good use of color, design, effects, and original ideas to support topic.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Excellent use of color, design, effects, and originality to maximize topic.
Poster Graphic/Image Communication
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Very few images used and not relevant to the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video used do not match the storyline or enrich the project.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video is inconsistently used and is not clearly matched with the topic.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video match most of the topic and communicate symbolism or metaphors.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video creates emotion to match topic, and communicate symbolism or metaphors.
Poster Text Communication
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No text was used in the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Choice of text does not enhance the project, contains many errors.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Text choices are appropriate but contain errors.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Text choices are good and support the project ideas.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Text choices are powerful, vivid and descriptive to audience.
Poster Quality Images/Video/Music
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No images or video were used. Music (if used) is not relevant or is inappropriate.
1 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
2 ( x 1 pts)

Images/video quality is inconsistent in the project. Music, if used, is relevant and appropriate.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Images/video quality is good throughout the project, easy to read. Music, if used, is relevant and appropriate
4 ( x 1 pts)

Images/video quality is excellent - high resolution, no size distortion, easy to read. Music, if used, is appropriate and enhances the project
Licensing
0.5 pts

Must include a selected Creative Commons license or other statement regarding copyright of the participant(s) work.
0 ( x 0.5 pts)

The work was not licensed.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

The work has a Creative Commons license or copyright statement.
Embedded Video Quality-Sound
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No sound or music was used in the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
2 ( x 1 pts)

Sound quality is inconsistent in the project.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Sound quality is good throughout the project.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Sound quality is excellent throughout the project.
Embedded Video Introduction
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No obvious introduction.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Introduction not relevant or appropriate for the presentation of the topic.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Introduction not effective in capturing attention.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Introduction was creative and mostly captured attention.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Creative introduction captured attention immediately.
Embedded Video-Delivery
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Presentation does not cover topic, does not reference the Glog.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Presentation covers topic but with minimal information, minimal reference to the Glog.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Presentation covers topic but delivery and integration of the Glog is inconsistent.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Presentation covers information completely and explain project, integrates Glog into delivery.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Presentation covers all relevant information and explains topic with a logical delivery. Integrates Glog seamlessly.
Embedded Video -Conclusion
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No obvious conclusion.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Conclusion impled by not supportive of topic.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Conclusion evident but provided weak support of topic.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Strong conclusion.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Excellent with strong concluding statement.
Documentation
1 pts

Any music, photographs, text, trademarks, or names that are used in the project must be properly cited and documented. Must follow copyright and must follow school district rules for student privacy and use of photographs or student work.
0 ( x 1 pts)

No information provided on copyright or source citations.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright is questionable, sources are not cited.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright is questionable, sources are not properly cited.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright statements and permissions are included, most sources are properly cited.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Work is original, or copyright statements and permissions are included, all sources are documented.



Keywords:
  • Missouri, FCCLA, Glogster, Virtual Poster

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n220