Skip to main content

iRubric: Musical Project Assessment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Musical Project Assessment Musical Project Assessment Assess musical project work in class, musical presentation and composer presentation. Rubric Code: S4X822 By Melbliu Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Music Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Musical Project
	Needs Improvement 60 pts	Poor 70 pts	Fair 80 pts	Good 90 pts	Excllent 100 pts
Work in class	Needs Improvement Did not do any work on project in class. Did not stay on task or follow directions. Did not bring any materials to class.	Poor Only worked on project in class a little bit. Had a hard time staying on task and following directions. Brought materials to class once or twice.	Fair Worked on project in class some times. Had a hard time staying on task and following directions. Brought some materials to class to work on project.	Good Worked on project in class most of the time. Usually stayed on task and followed directions. Brought materials to class to work on project most days.	Excllent Worked on project in class every day. Stayed on task and followed directions. Brought materials to class to work on project every day.
Work with partner	Needs Improvement Did not work well with partner. Was absent most of the time. Did not do any work on the project.	Poor Had a hard time working with partner. Was absent many days. One partner did more work than the other.	Fair Had a hard time working with partner. Was in class some of the time. One partner did more work than the other.	Good Worked pretty well with partner. Was in class most of the time to help with the project. Each partner did some work on project.	Excllent Worked well with partner. Was in class every day to help with the project. Each partner did equal work on project.
Poster presentation	Needs Improvement Only one partner did the presenting. Presentation was not well planned out and was not well presented.	Poor One partner did most of the presenting. Presentation was not well planned out, and had a hard time presenting.	Fair Each partner took time to present. Each partner knew what they were going to talk about, but had a hard time with their presentation.	Good Each partner did some presenting. Each partner had a plan for the presentation and knew for the most part what they were going to talk about.	Excllent Each partner did equal time poster. Each partner had a well planned presentation and knew what they were going to talk about.
Composer presentation	Needs Improvement Did not have notes. Was not well presented. Had no plan for what was presented. Was not informative and not accurate.	Poor Had notes but nothing written on them. Had a hard time presenting. Was not real sure of what was presented. Lacked some information or was not real accurate.	Fair Had notes but not much written on them. Was presented okay. Had an idea of what was presented. Was informative and accurate.	Good Had notes. Was pretty well presented. Had a plan of what was presented. Was pretty well informative and accurate.	Excllent Had good notes. Was well presented. Had a good plan of what was presented. Was very informative and accurate.
Composition portfolio	Needs Improvement Portfolio is badly presented. Paper is missing a composer or written about the wrong person.	Poor Folio is not the correct length and does not have correct structure and not well organized.	Fair Portfolio is presented at basic level and has some mistakes. Paper is informative. Not well organized, difficult to read	Good Portfolio is well organized and well presented, but has some mistakes. Paper is informative and well written. Paper is written about the correct composer or composers.	Excllent Portfolio is well organized and well presented with correct grammar. Paper is very informative and well written. Paper is written about the correct composer or composers.
Peer Evaluations
	Needs Improvement 10 pts	Poor 15 pts	Good 20 pts	Excellent 25 pts	Superior 30 pts
Student Evaluations	Needs Improvement Received a 10 or below from most students.	Poor Received a 15 from most students.	Good Received a 20 from most students.	Excellent Received a 25 from most students.	Superior Received a 30 from most students.
Partner Evaluations	Needs Improvement Received a 10 or below from most students.	Poor Received a 15 from most students.	Good Received a 20 from most students.	Excellent Received a 25 from most students.	Superior Received a 30 from most students.

Subjects:

Music

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Music rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178