Skip to main content

iRubric: SOC1030 Discussion Posting Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
SOC1030 Discussion Posting Rubric SOC1030 Discussion Posting Rubric Rubric Code: S47CW2 By comiteavaluo Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Assignment Grade Levels: (none)

Discussion Posting
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Knowledge of Subject Matter Did the stsudent's posting display an understanding of the sociolgical material? Was the student able to relate new information to old information learned int he course to date?	Poor Displays low standard or no understanding of learned materials.	Fair Illustrates basic knowledge of learned materials; heavy reliance on repeating rather than applying learning. Does not expand upon central concepts.	Good Good understanding of subject matter; presents some new or expanded ideas.	Excellent Brings forth new or expanded ideas with original examples that reflect high-level comprehension of the learned materials.
Critical Thinking Is the response not just a summary but an attempt by the student to push toward a particular personal meaning?	Poor Rudimentary and superificial; no analysis or insight is displayed; a critical thinking question or though is not included in posting.	Fair Generally competent; information is thin and commonplace; a question or thought is provided.	Good Substantial information; some thought, insight and analyses has taken place; questions and thoughts stimulate interaction.	Excellent Rich in content; full of original thought, insight and analyses; relevant questions and thoughts that stimulate interaction.
Connections Does the student directly address the question? Does the student make connections to previous or current, real-life situations or own practice/career	Poor No connections are made; off topic. Does not relevance to own situation or practice.	Fair Limited if any connections; vague generalities.	Good Answers the question; makes some connections to own situation or practice; lack of depth and/or detail.	Excellent Directly answers the question and makes clear, relevant and practical applications to own situation/practice.
Research Does the posting contain outside research, for example, web links, scholarly periodicals, correct references to text?	Poor Only 1 research material is provided or no outiside reaearch found in the posting. Note: Evidence of plagiarized due to absence of in-text citations and or reference page and or violation of our College's Academic Integrity Policy will result in an automatic 0 grade for this assignment.	Fair Outside research is provided but not in correct APA format and style.	Good Contains 2 college-level research materials in correct APA format and style.	Excellent Contains 3 or more college-level research materials applied to support and extend ideas in correct APA format and style; varied and current reference sources.
Timeliness Did the student post early enough (as determined by prof.) for others to respond with ease?	Poor Both posting and responses posted less than 24 hours before due date.	Fair Initial posting and responses posted by deadline -24 hours prior to due date.	Good Initial posting and responses completed on or slightly before deadline - 2 days prior to posting due date.	Excellent Initial postings and responses completed with sufficient time for peers to read, reflect and respond - a minimum of 3 business days prior to posting due date.
Responses to Others Does the student provide original, thoughtful, and comprehensive responses to 2 other postings?	Poor Does not respond to others' postings or blatantly dissrespects others' views.	Fair Respectfully supports or refutes 2 postings but does not refer to the posting directly or simply agrees or disagrees without explanation.	Good Respectfully supports or refutes 2 postings, introducing a new topic or concept but underdeveloped response.	Excellent Rspectfully supports or refutes 2 other postings with additional evidence and that related to learned materials.
Stylistics Does the student's writing correct grammar mechanics, and style?	Poor Numerous errors making understanding impossible.	Fair Numerous grammar, spelling and style errors. Basic sentence structure. Errors interfere with content.	Good Minimal grammar, spelling and style errors. Varied sentence structure.	Excellent Absence of grammar, spelling and style errors; use of complex and compound sentence structure.

Keywords:

Discussion Posting

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Social Sciences rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202