Skip to main content

iRubric: Bob Anderson: Cambridge Consulting Group rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Bob Anderson: Cambridge Consulting Group 
Rubric Code: S44CC5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

1 pts

Good

1.7 pts

Excellent

2 pts

Assessment of Challenges

Poor

Does not present challenge(s)
Fair

Weak or unclear assessment of challenges or provides only part of the challenge(s).
Good

Most of the challenges presented, all clearly and concisely. Links are logical and clear. Supporting details precise and concise. Risks discussed.
Excellent

Exceptional -- clear and compelling presentation of all main challenges. Linkages and tie-ins are logical, obvious, and add value. Supporting details precise and concise. Risks accurate and precise.
Assessment of Causes

Poor

Does not define causes.
Fair

Causal analysis weak or unclear. Provides some supporting details but mostly repeats case. Few links or unclear or illogical links.
Good

Causal analysis of average quality and well thought out. Links are logical and clear. Supporting details precise and concise. Demonstrates critical thinking regarding case characters, organizational structure or culture, and/or external forces.
Excellent

Exceptional -- clear and compelling presentation of all main challenges. Linkages and tie-ins are logical, obvious, and add value. Supporting details precise and concise. Demonstrates critical thinking regarding case characters, organizational structure or culture, and external forces.
Plan of Action

Poor

POA not (SMART) specific, measureable, achievable, relevant and timelined.
Fair

POA partially meets characteristics of SMART; likely constraints not well understood.
Good

POA SMART. Mentions and attempts to resolve constraints.
Excellent

POA exceptional -- clear and compelling. Thoroughly covers all SMART components. Targets roots of causes and utilizes available resources or defines those needed. Provides reasonable attempts to overcome constraints.
Clear writing

Poor

Text barely comprehensible. More than 5 grammar or spelling errors. Visuals difficult to read.
Fair

Text mostly comprehensible, requires reader- interpretation. 3-4 grammar or spelling errors. Visuals need clarification.
Good

Text comprehensible, requiring minimal reader -interpretation.
1-2 grammar or spelling errors. Visuals clear.
Excellent

Text readily comprehensible, requiring no interpretation. No grammar or spelling errors. Visuals clear and compelling.
Persuasive writing

Poor

Unclear or difficult to understand. Inadequate or inaccurate use of vocabulary or grammar.
Fair

Clear. Some inadequate and/or inaccurate use of vocabulary and/or grammar.
Good

Clear, articulate. Adequate and accurate use of vocabulary and grammar. Uses visual tools, such as bulleted/numbered lists, charts, or graphs, to link information and keep reader focused.
Excellent

Clear, articulate, persuasive. Rich use of vocabulary and grammar. Uses visually compelling tools, such as bulleted/numbered lists, charts, or graphs, to link information, keep reader focused, and add richness and value to argument.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202